Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10091 Kant
Judgement Date : 8 April, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:14527
WP No. 10386 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 10386 OF 2024 (GM-POLICE)
BETWEEN:
KARNATAKA RAJYA NIVRUTTA
NAUKARARA MATTU GELEYARA
SAMSKRATIKA KRIDE HAAGU
MANORAJANA KENDRA (NO),
(KARNATAKA STATE RETIRED EMPLOYEES
AND FRIENDS, CULTURAL, SPORTS
AND AMUSEMENT CENTRE (R)),
REGISTERED UNDER CO-OPERATIVE
SOCIETIES ACT, 1960,
BEARING REG. NO.99/2012-13,
SITUATED AT NO.35,
2ND FLOOR, 60 FEET ROAD,
PATTEGARA PAALYA,
Digitally signed BENGALURU - 560 079,
by NAGAVENI
Location:
HIGH COURT (REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY),
OF
KARNATAKA SRI. ADAVEESHAIAH,
COMMERCIAL TAX DEPARTMENT (RETIRED),
AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. HANUMANTHARAYA D., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA,
BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY,
LAW AND ORDER DEPARTMENT,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:14527
WP No. 10386 of 2024
VIDHANA SOUDHA,
BENGALURU - 560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE,
BANGALORE CITY, NO.1,
INFANTRY ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 001.
3. INSPECTOR OF POLICE,
GOVINDARAJANAGARA POLICE STATION,
BANGALORE - 560 079.
4. DEPUTY INSPECTOR GENERAL (CCB),
COTTONPET MAIN ROAD,
CHICKPET,
BANGALORE - 560 053.
5. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (CCB),
COTTONPET MAIN ROAD,
CHICKPET,
BANGALORE - 560 053.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. RAHUL CARIAPPA K.S., AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF
THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE
RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES TO REFRAIN FROM INTERFERING
WITH THE DAY TO DAY ACTIVITIES OF THE PETITIONER AND
FROM CAUSING DISTURBANCE AND OBSTRUCTION FROM THE
SMOOTH RUNNING OF THE WORKS OF TO SECURE THE END
OF JUSTICE AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2024:KHC:14527
WP No. 10386 of 2024
ORDER
Heard Sri. Hanumantharaya D., learned counsel
appearing for the petitioner and Sri. Rahul Cariappa K.S., the
learned AGA appearing for the respondents.
2. The petitioner is before this Court, seeking the
following prayers:
"i. Issue appropriate writ or order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent authorities to refrain from interfering with the day to day activities of the petitioner and from causing disturbance and obstruction from the smooth running of the works of to secure the ends of justice.
ii. Issue appropriate writ or order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent not to interfere in the lawful recreational activities of playing skill games such as chess, carom, dart game, wall coin game, six colour games, rummy, table tennis billiards/snooker, cards club.
iii. Issue appropriate writ or order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent not to insist on the petitioners from obtaining license to play games of skill either under of the Karnataka Police Act or under licensing and controlling of the place of public amusement.
iv. Issue such other writ, order or direction as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in the facts and circumstances of the case."
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner
would submit that the issue in the lis stands covered by the
NC: 2024:KHC:14527
judgment rendered by the Co-ordinate Bench in the case of
M/S NAVARANG ASSOCIATION Vs. THE STATE OF
KARNATAKA1, the Co-ordinate Bench has held as follows:
"Learned Government Advocate to accept notice for respondents No.1 to 7 and file memo of appearance in four weeks.
2. The petitioner is before this Court seeking for issue of mandamus or any other appropriate writ in the manner as has been sought in the petition. The issue which has been raised in the instant petition has already been considered by this Court in W.P.No.30071/2014 dated 15-10-2014 (between The Media N. Members Club vs. State of Karnataka and Others) wherein the petition was disposed of with the following directions:-
"(i) The petitioner shall install within a period of six weeks, CC TV cameras, at all the places of access to its members and also at all the places, wherein games(s) is / are played by the members. The CC TV footage of at least prior 15 days' period shall be made available by the petitioner, to the police, as and when called upon to do so.
(ii) The petitioner shall issue identity card(s) to all its member(s), which shall be produced by the member(s), when called upon by the police, during the raid(s) and surveillances etc.
(iii) The petitioner shall not allow any non-
member(s) or the guest(s) of the member(s), to make use of its premises for the purpose of playing any kind of game(s) or recreational activities.
(iv) The petitioner shall not permit any activity by any of its member(s), by indulging in acts of amusement, falling within the
W.P.No.38068/2015 disposed on 09.09.2015
NC: 2024:KHC:14527
definition of Ss.2(14) & 2(15) of the Act and shall not permit any game(s) of chance as per Explanation (II) of Sub- section (7) of Section 2 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The member(s) shall not be allowed to play any kind of game(s) with stakes or make any profit or gain out of the game(s) played.
(v) The petitioner shall put proper mechanism in place and shall ensure that no game(s) is played in any unlawful manner by the member(s). If the police find that game(s) played is contrary to any law and in violation of the settled practice, it is open to them to take action against petitioner and the offenders, in accordance with law.
(vi) The jurisdictional police shall have liberty to visit premises periodically and/or on receipt of any information about any unlawful activity being carried on in the petitioner's premises.
(vii) The respondents are directed not to interfere with the lawful recreational activities carried on by the members of the petitioner - Club / Association.
(viii) It is made clear that this order would not come in the way of the jurisdictional police invoking the provisions of the Act and taking action in accordance with law, if the member(s) of the petitioner are found to have indulged in any unlawful or immoral activities."
This writ petition is also disposed of in the aforesaid terms."
4. In the light of the issue standing covered by
judgment rendered by the Co-ordinate Bench supra and the
NC: 2024:KHC:14527
facts being undisputed, the petition stands disposed on the
same terms.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SJK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!