Citation : 2024 Latest Caselaw 10015 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 April, 2024
-1-
NC: 2024:KHC:14267
MFA No. 3349 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL, 2024
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.3349 OF 2013(MV-D)
BETWEEN:
JAMSHED AHAMED
S/O LATE C.H.ABDUL LATEEF SAB,
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
R/O S.M.STREET,
CHIKMAGALUR-577 101.
...APPELLANT
(APPELLANT-ABSENT)
AND:
1. IMRANKHAN
S/O NASMULLA KHAN,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
DRIVER,
MAHABALESHWARA RAO,
C/O AMEER JAAN,
Digitally signed by S/O HAKEEMSAB,
THEJASKUMAR N BEHIND KANNADA SCHOOL,
Location: HIGH RIJAYAPURA,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA CHIKMAGALUR-577 101.
2. AMMERJAAN
AGED ABOUT 56 YEARS,
OWNER, MAHABALESHWARA BUS,
R/O BEHIND KANNADA SCHOOL
VIJAYAPURA,
CHIKMAGALUR-577 101.
3. THE BRANCH MANAGER,
ORIENTAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
NO.7, UTHAMAR GANDHI SALAI,
-2-
NC: 2024:KHC:14267
MFA No. 3349 of 2013
2ND FLOOR,
ROSY TOWERS,
NUMGAMBAKKAM,
CHENNAI-600 034.
TAMILNADU.
4. THE MANAGER,
NEW INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
NEHRU ROAD,
SHIMOGA-577 201.
...RESPONDENTS
(R1 AND R2-HELD SUFFICIENT V/O DATED:10.07.2014;
BY SRI. ASHOK.N.PATIL., ADVOCATE FOR R3;
SRI. G.N.RAJENDRA., ADVOCATE FOR R4)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:07.12.2012
PASSED IN MVC NO.37/2007 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL
DISTRICT JUDGE, MEMBER, MACT, CHIKMAGALUR.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR
FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The name of the appellant is called out thrice in the open
Court. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant
either personally or through video conferencing. The appellant
is absent.
As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal
was listed on 03.09.2021, on that day, counsel for the
NC: 2024:KHC:14267
appellant was permitted to retire from the case and it was
ordered to print the name of the appellant in the cause list.
This Court vide order dated:09.01.2024 Court notice was
issued to the appellant. A perusal of the office note depicts that
appellant is served and unrepresented. The appellant has not
made any efforts to engage the services of other advocate or
conducted the case as party in person.
As already noted above, the name of the appellant is
called out thrice in the open Court. There is no representation
on behalf of the appellant either personally or through video
conferencing. The appellant is absent. It appears that the
appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence,
the Miscellaneous First Appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE MRP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!