Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6657 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 September, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:34121
RFA No. 1390 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1390 OF 2014 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
1. MR. SHANKAR S. R,
S/O LATE RAMAIAH @ RAMANJAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS,
RESIDING AT NO.314, 1ST BLOCK,
15TH MAIN, 3RD STAGE,
BASAVESHWARANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 079.
2. SMT. CHINNAMMA ,
W/O LATE RAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
R/AT 314, 15TH MAIN,
3RD STAGE, 1ST BLOCK,
BASAVESHWARNAGAR,
Digitally BANGALORE - 560 079.
signed by
MALATESH
KC
...APPELLANTS
Location:
HIGH (A1 AND A2 ABSENT)
COURT OF
KARNATAKA
AND:
1. SRI. RAJAN SAM,
S/O LATE M. M. SAMUEL,
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
R/AT NO.3, CHANCELLOR'S COURT,
O'SHANGANESY ROAD, LANGFORD GARDEN
BANGALORE - 560 025.
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:34121
RFA No. 1390 of 2014
REPRESENTED BY HIS & GPA HOLDER,
SRI. HARISH SAM RAJAN,
S/O RAJAN SAM,
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
R/AT NO.51, 5TH CROSS,
P & T LAYOUT, HORAMAVU MAIN ROAD,
BANGALORE - 560 043.
2. MR. SATHYANARAYANA @ SATHYAPPA,
S/O LATE RAMANJNAIAH @ RAMANJANAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
R/AT NO.9, BHOVI-PALYA
1ST FLOOR, MAHALAKSHMI LAYOUT
BANGALORE - 560 096.
3. MR. KANAKARAJ S.R,
S/O LATE RAMAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS,
R/AT 314, 15TH MAIN, 3RD STAGE
1ST BLOCK, BASAVESHWARANAGAR,
BANGALORE - 560 079.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. A. SEBASTIAN, ADVOVATE AND
SRI. P. RAVEENDRAN, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. P. SURAJ PATIL, ADVOCATE FOR R3;
VIDE ORDER DATED 11.12.2014 NOTICE TO R2 IS
DISPENSED WITH)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/O-41, RULE-1, RW/SEC.96 OF CPC,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED: 28.07.2014
PASSED IN O.S.534/2012 ON THE FILE OF THE XLIV-ADDL.
CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING
THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND PERMANENT INJUNCTION.
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:34121
RFA No. 1390 of 2014
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Court notice issued to appellant Nos.1 and 2 is
returned with an endorsement 'insufficient address'.
2. The matter was remanded from the Hon'ble Apex
Court and thereafter, learned counsel for the appellant
filed a memo for retirement. This court after taking note
of the contents of the retirement memo, permitted the
learned counsel to retire from the case and by way of
abundant caution issued court notice to the appellants.
3. Left with no other alternative, appeal stands
dismissed for non prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KAV
CT: BHK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!