Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6598 Kant
Judgement Date : 19 September, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:33825
CRL.RP No. 846 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 19TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 846 OF 2015
BETWEEN:
SRI. NAGASHETTY VAMADEVA,
S/O NAGASHETTY JAMBAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
AGRICULTURIST, ALADOOR VILLAGE,
HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI TALUK,
BELLARY DISTRICT-583 212.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. G.M. SRINIVASAREDDY, ADVOCATE)
AND:
SRI. A. PARASHURAMAPPA,
S/O A. BASAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
EMPLOYEE OF TPEO, BEO,
R/O JAGALURU TOWN-577 238.
...RESPONDENT
Digitally signed (BY SRI. N. PRAVEEN KUMAR, ADVOCATE)
by THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 OF CR.P.C PRAYING TO
RENUKAMBA SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED 12.6.2015
KG
PASSED BY THE II ADDL. DIST. AND S.J., DAVANAGERE IN
Location: High CRL.A.NO.144/2014 AND ALSO THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER
Court of
Karnataka DATED 10.11.2014 PASSED BY THE C.J. (JR. DN.) AND
J.M.F.C., JAGALUR IN C.C.NO.258/2012 AND ALLOW THE
PRESENT PETITION.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:33825
CRL.RP No. 846 of 2015
ORDER
The revision petitioner / accused and respondent /
complainant along with their respective counsels are present.
2. The parties have filed a joint compromise petition
under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881
reporting settlement of the dispute between the parties and it
is submitted that the matter is settled for a sum of
Rs.1,30,000/- and the amount has been received by the
complainant. Hence, permission was sought for compounding of
the offences.
3. Both the parties have also filed a joint affidavit
reporting settlement. The contents of the compromise petition
are read over and explained to the parties in presence of their
respective counsels in Kannada language known to them and
they admit the contents are true and correct.
4. I am satisfied that the parties have settled their
dispute amicably without any threat or coercion. The
compromise is not against any settled law. In view of the same,
the application filed under Section 147 of the Negotiable
NC: 2023:KHC:33825 CRL.RP No. 846 of 2015
Instruments Act, 1881 needs to be allowed. Accordingly, I
proceed to pass the following:
ORDER
(i) The application filed by both the parties under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is allowed. The matter stands compounded.
(ii) The impugned judgment of conviction and order of sentence passed by learned Civil Judge, Junior Division and JMFC, Jagalur in C.C.No.258/2012 dated 10.11.2014 and confirmed in Crl.A.No.144/2014 by Learned II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Davanagere vide judgment dated 12.06.2015 are set aside.
(iii) The accused / revision petitioner stands acquitted of the offence punishable under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
(iv) In view of the compounding of the offence, the bail bonds executed by the accused / revision petitioner stand cancelled.
(v) The compromise petition shall be part of this judgment.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!