Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6547 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 September, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:33541
WP No. 14816 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R DEVDAS
WRIT PETITION NO.14816 OF 2023 (GM-RES)
BETWEEN:
DR. K.N. VENKATESH
S/O K C NARAYANAPPA
AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
ADVOCATE BY PROFESSION
RESIDING AT NO 106, 5TH CROSS,
VINAYAKA LAYOUT, BHOOPASANDRA
R.M.V 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE 560094
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI DR.K.N.VENKATESH (PETITIONER-ABSENT)
AND:
Digitally signed by
JUANITA 1. SMT. SAVITRI SHIVAPUTRA KUJJI
THEJESWINI
Location: HIGH X ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL
COURT OF
KARNATAKA AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CCH 26,
CITY CIVIL COURT COMPLEX
BANGALORE 560001
2. C SATHYANARAYANA
S/O A B CHIKKAMUNIAVALAPPA
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS
R/O 6, 2ND MAIN ROAD,
ADUGODI, BANGALORE 560030
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:33541
WP No. 14816 of 2023
3. M JAGANNATH ALVA
S/O SANKAPPA ALVA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
ADVOCATE BY PROFESSION
C/O M J ALVA AND CO
BEHIND BANK OF BAORDA
DOUBLE ROAD (K H ROAD)
SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE 560027
4. RAMAMURTHY
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS,
ADVOCATE BY PROFESSION
C/O M J ALVA AND CO
BEHIND BANK OF BAORDA
DOUBLE ROAD (K H ROAD)
SHANTHINAGAR, BANGALORE 560027
5. HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
PRINCIPAL BENCH, DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BENGALURU 560001, THE REGISTRAR GENERAL
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
BANGALORE 560001
...RESPONDENTS
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 &
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING
THE R5 TO CONDUCT A DEPARTMENTAL ENQUIRY REGARDING
THE ILLEGAL, WRONG / ERRONEOUS ORDERS VIDE ANNEXURE
G1 TO G4 PASSED BY THE R1 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT
DEBTOR IN EX CASE NO 1137/2015 PENDING ON THE FILE OF
THE HONBLE X ADDL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS COURT, CITY
CIVIL COMPLEX, BANGALORE AND TO TAKE SUITABLE AND
NECESSARY ACTION AGAINST THE R1.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:33541
WP No. 14816 of 2023
ORDER
R.DEVDAS J., (ORAL)
On 08.09.2023, the following order was passed:
"There are twenty office objections raised including the maintainability of the writ petition as against respondent No.1, a Judicial Officer, who is protected under the Judges (Protection) Act, 1985.
Matter is called out. There is no representation for the petitioner.
Re-list this matter on 15.09.2023. If there is no representation for the petitioner on the next date of hearing and if there is non-compliance of office objections, the writ petition will be dismissed."
2. Matter is called out. There is no representation
for the petitioner. Office objections have not been
complied with. Consequently, the writ petition stands
dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KLY
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!