Vinaykumar. L vs Smt. Sharada
2023 Latest Caselaw 6474 Kant

                                             -1-
                                                       NC: 2023:KHC:32991
                                                     RSA No. 1396 of 2021




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                         DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2023

                                           BEFORE

                             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH

                        REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1396 OF 2021 (INJ)

                   BETWEEN:

                   1.    VINAYKUMAR. L
                         S/O LATE LINGANNA
                         AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS,

                   2.    MANUKUMAR L
                         S/O LATE LINGANNA
                         AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS,

                         ALL ARE R/AT BOODITHITTU VILLAGE
                         MADDUR DHAKLE, AGARA HOBLI
                         YELANDUR TALUK
                         CHAMARAJANAGAR DIST-571442
Digitally signed
by SHARANYA T
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                                                    ...APPELLANTS
KARNATAKA
                   (BY SMT. SUMATHI S, ADVOCATE)

                   AND:

                   1.    SMT. SHARADA
                         W/O LATE NANJUNDASWAMY
                         AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS
                         RESIDING AT BOODITHITTU VILLAGE
                         MADDUR DHAKLE, AGARA HOBLI
                         YELANDUR TALUK
                         CHAMARAJANAGAR DIST-571442
                          -2-
                                      NC: 2023:KHC:32991
                                    RSA No. 1396 of 2021




2.   SMT UMAMAHSESHWARI
     W/O KUMAR
     D/O NANJUNDASWAMY
     AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
     RESIDING AT ALAHALLI VILLAGE
     KASABA HOBLI
     KOLLEGAL-571442

3.   PRADEEP KUMAR
     S/O LATE NANJUNDASWAMY
     AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS,

4.   SUMA
     D/O LATE NANJUNDASWAMY
     AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS,
     RESIDING AT BOODITHITTU VILLAGE
     MADDUR DHAKLE
     AGARA HOBLI
     YELANDUR TALUK
     CHAMARAJANAGAR DIST-571442


                                        ...RESPONDENTS


      THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC

AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 07.07.2020

PASSED IN R.A.No.42/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR

CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, CHAMARAJANAGAR AND ETC.


      THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
                             -3-
                                         NC: 2023:KHC:32991
                                      RSA No. 1396 of 2021




                        ORDER

This Court vide order dated 29.08.2023, in view of

time sought by the learned counsel for the appellants, two

weeks time was granted and also made it clear that if

office objections are not complied within two weeks, the

matter will be dismissed on the next date of hearing.

Inspite of the said order, the counsel for the appellants is

not pursuing the matter diligently and hence, it appears

that he is not interested in prosecuting the case. Thus,

the appeal is dismissed for non-compliance of office

objections.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SN