Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7332 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 October, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:37934
RSA No. 907 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.907 OF 2013 (PAR)
BETWEEN:
K RAMACHANDRA BHATTA
S/O LATE KRISHNA BHATTA
AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS
R/O KHANDIKA VILLAGE
SAGAR TALUK 577401
SHIMOGA DISTRICT
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. S V PRAKASH, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. SMT NAGARATHNA
D/O K.R. KRISHNA BHATTA
Digitally AGED ABOUT 62 YEAR
signed by R R/O KHANDIKA VILLAGE
DEEPA SAGAR TALUK 577401
Location: High
2. SMT. SHANKUNTALA @ PREMA V. JOIS
Court of
Karnataka W/O VENKATAGIRI JOIS
AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
R/O KATTINAKERE VILLAGE
SHIMOGA POST
SORAB TALUK - 577429
3. SMT. MAHALAXMAMMA
W/O K.R. KRISHNA BHATTA
AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS
R/O KHANDIKA VILLAGE
SAGAR TALUK - 577 401
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:37934
RSA No. 907 of 2013
4. SMT. BHAGIRATHI
W/O MANJUNATHA S. HEGDE
AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS
R/O KORLAKAI VILLAGE
ADUKATTA POST
SIDDAPURA TALUK - 581 355
5. SMT. LEELAVATHI
W/O RAGHAVENDRA
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
C/O SAI SARASWATHI
VIDYA KENDRA
BHAGADI MYSORE - 570 001
6. SMT. PADMAVATHI
W/O SHREEPADA R. BHATTA
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/O TOODUR, AT AND POST
THIRTHAHALLI TALUK - 577 432
7. GAJANNA BHATTA KK
S/O KRISHNA BHATTA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
R/O KHANDIKA VILLAGE
POST KHANDIKA
SAGAR TALUK - 577 401
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S SHIVAMANDA, ADVOCATE FOR R1-R3, R6 & R7
R4 IS SERVED)
THIS RSA IS FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC., AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT & DECREE DTD 15.12.2012 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.48/2011 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE & JMFC., SAGAR, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND
CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DTD 14.7.2011
PASSED IN OS.NO.181/2004 THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL
JUDGE (JR.DN) SAGAR.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:37934
RSA No. 907 of 2013
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo
praying to dismiss the appeal as withdrawn on the ground
that the matter is settled amicably and hence the
appellant does not want to proceed with the appeal.
2. Memo is placed on record.
3. In view of the same, the appeal is dismissed as
withdrawn.
4. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending I.As.,
if any, do not survive for consideration and are accordingly
disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
RD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!