Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7287 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 October, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:37445
RSA No. 1663 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 1663 OF 2019 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
C. VENKATARAMAPPA
DEAD BY LR
1. RAJAMMA
D/O LATE CHAMAKURU VENKATARAMAPPA
AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS,
R/O. KARASANAPALLI VILLAGE
PEDDAPANJANI MANDALAM,
PUNGANURU TALUK
CHITTOOR DISTRICT
ANDHRA PRADESH-571001.
2. G.V. NEELAKANTAIAH
S/O LATE C.VENKATARAMAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
Digitally signed
by SHARANYA T R/O. AGARA VILLAGE,
Location: HIGH DUGGASANDRA HOBLI,
COURT OF MULBAGAL TALUK
KARNATAKA
KOLAR-563131.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI SARAVANA S., ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. NAGAMMA
D/O LATE CHAMAKURU GANGADHARAPPA
W/O GANDLA VENKATARAMAPPA,
MAJOR, R/O DHANDAPALLI POST
THALLAPALLI VILLAGE,
PALAMANERU TALUK,
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:37445
RSA No. 1663 of 2019
CHITTOOR DISTRICT
ANDRA PRADESH-571001.
2. SMT. GURAMMA J.,
D/O THIPPANNA M.E.,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
3. JABBIR KHAN
S/O H.ANWAR KHAN,
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS,
R/O AKBAR ROAD,
SRINIVASAPURA TOWN
KOLAR-563 131.
4. S. RAMANAPPA
S/O SHANKARAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
5. M.N. BALARAME GOWDA
S/O M. NANJUNDAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS,
RESPONDENTS NO.2, 4 AND 5 ARE
R/O. AGARA VILLAGE,
DUGGASANDRA HOBLI,
MULBAGAL TALUK
KOLAR-563 131.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC, AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 29.06.2019 PASSED IN
R.A.NO.30/2014 ON THE FILE OF THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT
JUDGE AT KOLAR DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.01.2014 PASSED IN
O.S.NO.512/2006 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL
JUDGE AND JMFC, KOLAR (ITINERATING AT MULBAGAL).
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:37445
RSA No. 1663 of 2019
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for the appellants is absent today also
and on the previous occasion also, he was absent. However,
this Court, in the ends of justice, gave an opportunity and also
made it clear that if the learned counsel does not appear on the
next date of hearing, the appeal will be dismissed for non-
prosecution. Inspite of it, learned counsel for the appellants is
absent and he is not pursuing the matter diligently.
Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
ST
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!