Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7081 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 October, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:36242-DB
WA No. 1147 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
WRIT APPEAL NO. 1147 OF 2022 (LB-BMP)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. K SADANANDAN,
S/O LATE D VISHWANATHA MENON,
AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS,
H-42, SHRIRAM SADHANA APARTMENT,
M S RAMAIAH ROAD, GOKULA,
BENGALURU-560 054.
2. SRI. TARUN KUMAR GUPTA,
S/O LATE SATYA NARAYANA GUPTA,
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS,
3. SRI. ARUN KUMAR GUPTA,
Digitally signed S/O LATE SATYA NARAYAN GUPTA,
by SHARADA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
VANI B
Location: HIGH APPELLANTS No.2 & 3 ARE R/A H-43/44,
COURT OF SHRIRAM SADHANA APARTMENT,
KARNATAKA M S RAMAIAHA ROAD, GOKULA,
BENGALURU-560 054.
4. SRI. GUNASEKAR M R,
S/O LATE M R RUKMANGATHAN,
AGED ABUT 54 YEARS,
R/A H-45, SHRIRAM SADHANA APARTMENT,
M S RAMAIAHA ROAD, GOKULA
BENGALURU-560 054.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. RAVINDRANATH K.,ADVOCATE)
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:36242-DB
WA No. 1147 of 2022
AND:
1. SRI SRIKANT M PAI,
S/O MOHANDAS V PAI,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
R/A H-18, SHIRAM SADHANA,
109, MSR ROAD,
GOKULA EXTENSION,
BENGALURU-560 054.
2. BRUHAT BENGALURU
MAHANAGARA PALIKE
HUDSON CIRCLE,
BENGALURU-560 002.
REPRESENTED BY COMMISSIONER
3. BRUHAT BENGALURU
MAHANAGARA PALIKE
WARD NUMBER 16, 17, 37, 38, 42
2ND FLOOR, RTO COMPLEX,
KAMALA NEHRU EXTENSION,
YESHWANTHPUR,
BENGALURU-560 022.
REPRESENTED BY
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. SHRINIVAS B S., ADVOCATE FOR
SRI. B L SANJEEV., ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3)
THIS WRIT APPEAL FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO DISMISS THE
ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE IN WP
NO.12815/2022 DATED 11/08/2022.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
CHIEF JUSTICE DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:36242-DB
WA No. 1147 of 2022
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel appearing for the Appellants after
arguing the matter for some time, prays for leave to
withdraw the Appeal with liberty to file a Review Petition
before the learned Single Judge by whom the Writ Petition
was disposed off. Leave granted.
Ordered accordingly and Appeal is disposed off as
having been withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
If the Appellants avail the review remedy, learned
Single Judge may consider the fact that the Appellants
were not parties to the Writ Petition and the time has been
spent during the pendency of Writ Appeal before this
Bench.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE Bsv
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!