Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6911 Kant
Judgement Date : 3 October, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:35733
RFA No. 29 of 2009
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 03RD DAY OF OCTOBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL No.29 OF 2009
BETWEEN:
Y THIMMARAYAPPA
S/O Y THIMMAPPA
1(a) SMT.JAGADAMBA
W/O LATE Y.THIMMARAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
1(b) BALAJI PRASAD
S/O LATE Y.THIMMARAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
NO.303, 3RD FLOOR, 'B' BLOCK
ADITYA ELIGT APARTMENTS
B.S.MAQTA ROAD, SOMAJIGUDA
HYDERABAD, 500016
1(c) SMT.DR.SHARADHA PRABUJI
Digitally signed
by R
W/O DR.PRABUJI
MANJUNATHA
Location:
AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS
HIGH COURT
OF NO.57, GYATHIRI DEVI PARK
KARNATAKA
EXTENSION,
OPPOSITE STELLA MARIES SCHOOL
BANGALORE - 560 003
1(d) DR.VENKATESH YEDDULA
S/O LATE Y.THIMMARAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS
1(e) DR.MURALIDAR YEDDULA
S/O LATE Y.THIMMARAYAPPA
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:35733
RFA No. 29 of 2009
PROPOSED APPELLANT No.1(a) 1(d) and 1(e)
ARE RESIDING AT
NO.738, 12TH MAIN ROAD
3RD BLOCK, RAJAJINAGARA
BANGALORE - 560 010
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI K SRINIVASA GOWDA AND
SRI B.S.BUDIHAL, ADVOCATES)
AND:
1. M/S FAMOUS AUTO FINANCIERS (REGD.)
No.175, BHARATH COMPLEX,
AS CHAR STREET,
BANGALORE -53
REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER
MR A.A.GUPTA
2. M/S ARVIND AUTO FINANCIERS (REGD)
NO.16, SRINIVASA BUILDINGS,
PENUGOND ROAD,
HINDPUR 515 201
REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER
K.N.SRIRAMACHANDRA GUPTA
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI GURURAJ.R, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
VIDE ORDER DATED 05.08.2016 APPEAL DISMISSED AS
AGAINST R2)
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION
96 CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 19.11.1999 PASSED IN O.S.No.2997/1986 ON
THE FILE OF THE XVIII ADDL.CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BANGALORE,
DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND
CONSEQUENTIAL INJUNCTION.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS,
THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:35733
RFA No. 29 of 2009
JUDGMENT
Case called twice. None present on behalf of the
appellants.
There is delay of 3247 days in filing the appeal.
Appellants have not chosen to come forward and address
arguments on the application seeking condonation of delay,
despite granting sufficient time.
Accordingly, appeal stands dismissed for non
prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
kcm
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!