Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 8917 Kant
Judgement Date : 29 November, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:43290
MFA No. 2084 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 29TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2084 OF 2017 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
BASAVARAJAPPA H.M,
S/O MUNIYAPPA M,
AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS,
R/A ECHANUR VILLAGE,
TIPTUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. LAKSHMI KANTH K, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. JAYANNA,
S/O KALACHAR,
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS,
RESIDING AT CHROMITE MINE EMPLOYEE,
Digitally
signed by JAI BIDARE VILLAGE, BAGUR HOBLI,
JYOTHI J
Location: CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK,
HIGH
COURT OF HASSAN TALUK - 542 112.
KARNATAKA
2. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER,
TIPTUR TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 11,
(INSURER OF TEMPO).
3. D.R. MAHALINGAIAH,
S/O RAMANNA,
AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS,
GURUGADAHALLI POST, TIPTUR TALUK,
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:43290
MFA No. 2084 of 2017
TUMKUR DISTRICT - 572 011,
(DRIVER OF TEMPO).
4. H.S. ANANTHASUBBARAYA,
SINCE DEAD BY LRS,
4(A). H. A PRASAD,
S/O LATE ANANTHASUBBARAYA,
AGED ABOUT 69 YEARS,
RESIDING AT HULIYAR TOWN,
C.N HALLI TALUK, TUMKUR DISTRICT - 560 012.
5. THE ORIENTIAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
BY ITS MANAGER,
J.C.ROAD BRANCH, TUMKUR - 561 012,
(INSURER OF BUS).
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. NAGENDRA SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R1)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 06.12.2016 PASSED IN MVC
NO.548/1998 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
XIV MACT, AT TIPTUR, AWARDING COMPENSATION OF
RS.46,000/- WITH INTEREST AT THE RATE OF 6% P.A. FROM
THE DATE OF PETITION TILL REALIZATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This is an appeal of the year 2017. As per the office
objection, 50% of the award amount is not deposited and
NC: 2023:KHC:43290
even the steps are not taken for service of notice to
respondent Nos.2 to 5.
2. When the matter came up on 28.11.2023, there
was no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence,
this matter was directed to be listed for today. Today
also, there is no representation. Having filed an appeal in
the year 2017 and obtained an interim order, till now no
steps are taken and also there is no representation. It
appears that the appellant has no interest to prosecute the
matter.
3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
SD/-
JUDGE
MEG
CT: BHK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!