Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7965 Kant
Judgement Date : 21 November, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:41878
RFA No. 1144 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 21ST DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1144 OF 2008 (MON)
BETWEEN:
MRS. M. K. KOVILAMMA
AGED ABOUT 91 YEARS
W/O LATE RAMA VARMA
RESIDING AT H.GOLAHALLI
P.O. CHUNANDANAPURA,
KENGARI, BANGALORE - 560 060.
(REPRESENTED BY HER G.P.A. HOLDER
R.MOHANDAS)
Digitally signed by
R MANJUNATHA ...APPELLANT
Location: HIGH
COURT OF (BY SRI. V VINOD REDDY
KARNATAKA K.J.JAGADESH AND PRAVEEN R.J., ADVOCATES)
AND:
1. SRI. KUMARAN CHILDREN'S HOME EDUCATION
COUNCIL
TATA SILK FARM,
BANGALORE - 560 004.
A SOCIETY REGISTERED UNDER THE
KARNATAKA SOCIETIES REGISTRATION ACT, 1960.
REPRESNETED BY ITS SECRETARY
MRS. MEENAKSHI BALAKRISHNAN.
2. MR. N. SUBRAMANIAM
AGED ABOUT 82 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.4/1A,
DIWAN MADHAVA RAO RAOD,
BASAVANAGUDI
BANGALORE 560 004
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M D RAGHUNATH AND
SRI. HITESHKUMAR JAIN, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:41878
RFA No. 1144 of 2008
SRI. G.R.ANANTHARAM, ADVOCATE FOR
PROPOSED LRS OF R2)
THIS RFA IS FILED U/S 96 OF CPC AGAINST THE
JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 04.08.2008 PASSED BY THE
COURT O THE XIII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL JUDGE MAYOHALL
UNIT, BANAGALORE IN O.S.NO.10386/1989 IN SETTING ASIDE
THE JUDGMENT DECREE DATED 13-09-2005 PASSED BY
ALLOWING THE ABOVE APPEAL WITH COSTS IN THE INTEREST
OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
1. Counsel for the appellant submits that appellant died on
04.05.2015. Till today no application is filed to bring the
legal representative of the deceased appellant on record.
Further, I.A No.1/2013 is filed to bring the legal
representative of deceased respondent No.2 on record.
2. Sri.G.R.Anantharam, counsel for the proposed legal
representative of deceased respondent No.2 submits that
respondent No.2 died during the pendency of the suit on
26.12.2005 and for not taking appropriate steps, the suit
came to be dismissed as abated as against respondent
No.2 and therefore, the present application filed vide I.A
No.1/2013 is to be dismissed.
NC: 2023:KHC:41878
3. Taking note of the fact that the legal representatives of the
deceased appellant has not been brought on record, appeal
needs to be dismissed as abated by operation of law.
Further, if the respondent No.2 is a co-defendant, suit
against the co-defendant came to be dismissed as abated
in the Trial Court. I.A No.1/2013 is also dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
UN,
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!