Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7854 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 November, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:41672
RFA No. 1418 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1418 OF 2008 (MON)
BETWEEN:
SRI S M PATIL
S/O M.S.PATIL,
AGE:71 YRS
ADVOCATE, R/O NO.1,
SHANTHI NIKEHTAN
NEAR COFFEE BOARD LAYOUT
HEBBAL, KEMPAPURA
BANGALORE-24
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. R B SADASIVAPPA., ADVOCATE &
SRI. G.B. NANDISH GOWDA, ADVOCATE)
Digitally signed by AND:
R MANJUNATHA
Location: HIGH
COURT OF THE ORIENTAL BANK OF COMMERCE
KARNATAKA NO.24, H.J.S CHAMBERS
RICHMOND ROAD, BANGALORE-25
REP BY ITS MANAGER
...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. PRASHANT N HEGDE., ADVOCATE)
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S 96 CPC
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 28.07.2008
PASSED IN OS.No.6587/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE XXXIX
ADDL.CITY CIVIL JUDGE, BENGALURU, DECREEING THE SUIT
FOR RECOVERY OF MONEY AND CONSEQUENTLY DISMISSING
THE COUNTER CLAIM AND ETC.,
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:41672
RFA No. 1418 of 2008
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Appellant-Sri S.M.Patil and Sri M.Srinivasa Rao,
authorized signatory of the respondent bank are present.
2. Joint Memo is signed by both the parties. Contents
of the joint memo reads as under:
"The appellant and respondent submit that as suggested by this Hon'ble Court both the parties has discussed and agreed to settle the matter in dispute between themselves. Accordingly, the appellant has agree to withdraw the above appeal and not to claim any amount from the respondent Bank as his legal fee in O.S.No.6284/1991 and respondent bank has also agreed to withdraw suit claim in O.S.No.6587/2003 and withdraw the suit as not pressed.
WHEREFORE, appellant and respondent pray that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the above appeal as settled out of Court and order for refund of the Court fee paid in the above appeal and suit O.S.No.6587/2003 render justice and
NC: 2023:KHC:41672 RFA No. 1418 of 2008
equity. Both the parties to the above appeal admit that they have no claims against each other."
3. On enquiry with the parties, they submit that they
have redressed the differences and want to dispose of the
appeal in terms of the joint memo. Accordingly, there is
no impediment for this Court to dispose of the appeal in
terms of the joint memo. Hence, the following:
ORDER
(i) Appeal is disposed of in terms of the joint memo.
(ii) Office is directed to draw modified decree in terms of the joint memo by appending the copy of the joint memo as part of the decree.
(iii) In view of the settlement between the parties, appellant is entitled to refund of permissible Court fee before this Court and before the Trial Court which he has paid on counter claim and the plaintiff-bank who is the respondent is entitled to refund of permissible Court fee before the Trial Court.
NC: 2023:KHC:41672 RFA No. 1418 of 2008
(iv) Original title deeds belonging the appellant filed by the plaintiff-bank is entitled to be returned to the appellant, before the Trial Court, under due identification, in view of the settlement.
(v) No order as to costs.
Sd/-
JUDGE
kcm
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!