Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7853 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 November, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:41585-DB
MFA No.8064/2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE K.S.MUDAGAL
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K V ARAVIND
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.8064/2017 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
SRI.GIRIDAR M
S/O M LINGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
OCC: PLUMBER
R/AT NO.37, JAYANAGAR
BANGALORE - 560 004 ...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. S S MULIMANI, ADVOCATE (ABSENT))
AND:
1. THE MANAGER
THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE
COMPANY LIMITED
NO.90A, THURAIYUR ROAD
Digitally signed
NAMAKAL - 637 001
by PRABHU
KUMARA NO.27/11A, PALANISWAMY STREET
NAIKA
S P PUDUHUR, NAMAKAL DISTRICT
Location: High
Court of SALEM, TAMIL NADU DISTRICT - 637 001
Karnataka
2. SRI PARAG MAHARISHI
S/O M M MAHARISHI
AGE MAJOR
R/AT B C 288
MANGALAPUR INDUSTRIAL AREA
PH II NEW DELHI
(NAME OF THE REGISTERED OWNER )
3. SRI THANGADURAI P
S/O PUNUSWAMY A
AGE MAJOR
R/AT NO.170, INDIR COLONY
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:41585-DB
MFA No.8064/2017
APPANALLUR
THOTTIYAM TALUK
TRICHY DISTRICT
LORRY DRIVER
TEMPO ADDRESS
SHANTHI DS MUSIRI
4. THE MANAGER
RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE
COMPANY LIMITED
NO.28, 4TH FLOOR
NEAR RAIZA TOWERS
EASTERN WING
CENTENARY BUILDING
M G ROAD
BANGALORE - 560 001
5. SRI R NATARAJAN
S/O RANGASWAMY
NO.22/11A
PALANI SWAMY STREET
NAMAKAL, TAMIL NADU
(PRESENT R.C. OWNER) ... RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.LAKSHMI NARASAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR
SRI.A.M.VENKATESH, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI.H.C.BESTUR, ADVOCATE R4;
R3 & R5 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED;
APPEAL AGAINST R2 STANDS DISMISSED
V/C/O DTD: 07.11.2023)
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT
AND AWARD DATED 26.12.2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.6496/2011 ON
THE FILE OF THE VIII ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE & XXXIII
ACMM, MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM
PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF
COMPENSATION.
THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR
ORDERS THIS DAY, K.S.MUDAGAL J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
No representation for the appellant.
NC: 2023:KHC:41585-DB MFA No.8064/2017
The records show that even during three hearing dates
there was no representation for the appellant. Therefore,
appeal against respondent No.2 was dismissed. It appears that
the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
PKN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!