Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 7477 Kant
Judgement Date : 2 November, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:38986
MFA No. 1824 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 2ND DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 1824 OF 2013 (MV)
BETWEEN:
SRI. CHANNABASAIAH,
S/O CHANDAIAH,
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS,
OCC:COOLIE,
R/O HOSAKOLENAHALLI,
DAVANAGERE TQ AND DISTRICT-577 001.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SARITHA KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. HALESHAPPA,
S/O HANUMANTHAPPA,
AGE:43 YEARS,
R/OKONDADAHALLI VILAGE,
CHANNAGIRI TQ.,
Digitally signed DAVANAGERE DISTRICT-577 001.
by
RENUKAMBA K 2. V. MAHESHWARAPPA,
G
S/O THIPANNA, 53 YEARS,
Location: High R/O HOSAKOLENAHALLI VILLAGE,
Court of
Karnataka DAVANAGERE DISRICT-577 001.
SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY HIS LR'S
A. SRI. MANJUNARH,
S/O V. MAHESHWARAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS,
OCC: AGRI,
B. SRI. SANTHOSH
S/O V. MAHESHWARAPPA,
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:38986
MFA No. 1824 of 2013
AGE: 26 YRS, OCC: AGRI,
BOTH R/O HOSKOLENAHALLI VILLAGE,
DAVANGERE DISTRICT.
RESPONDENT NO.2(A & B) ARE LEGAL
REPRESENTATIVE OF LATE
V. MAHESHWARAPPA.
3. THE MANAGER,
NATIONAL INSURANCE CO.,LTD.,
DIVISIONAL OFFICE, MELGIRI PLAZA,
OPP:JJM MEDICAL COLLEGE,
MCC "B" BLOCK,
DAVANAGERE-577 001
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. O. MAHESH, ADVOCATE FOR R3,
R1 IS SERVED, V/O DATED 21.03.2018,
APPEAL AGAINST R2(A & B) IS DISMISSED)
THIS MFA FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED:6.11.2012 PASSED IN MVC
NO.499/2010 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR
CIVIL JUDGE & 6TH ADDITIONAL MACT, DAVANGERE,
DISMISSING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
It is evident from the records that the claim against
respondent No.2 is already abated.
2. Though L.R. applications were filed for bringing
the legal representatives of respondent No.2 as
respondent No.2(a) and 2(b), no steps were taken and
NC: 2023:KHC:38986 MFA No. 1824 of 2013
hence, the applications do not have any relevancy and the
claim was already dismissed vide peremptory order dated
21.03.2018. As such, when the claim against respondent
No.2 itself is abated, question of entertaining the appeal
does not arise at all. As such, the appeal stands dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
SS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!