Wednesday, 06, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Bangalore Development Authority vs Sri. Somashankar
2023 Latest Caselaw 2603 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2603 Kant
Judgement Date : 25 May, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Bangalore Development Authority vs Sri. Somashankar on 25 May, 2023
Bench: Alok Aradhe, Anant Ramanath Hegde
                                              -1-
                                                    WA No.1761 of 2019




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                        DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF MAY, 2023
                                         PRESENT
                        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
                                              AND
                    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
                          WRIT APPEAL NO.1761 OF 2019 (BDA)
               BETWEEN:

               1.   BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
                    REPT BY ITS COMMISSIONER
                    T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD
                    KUMARA PARK WEST
Digitally
signed by           BENGALURU-560 020.
RUPA V                                                    ...APPELLANT
Location:      (BY SRI. B.S. SACHIN, ADV.,)
High Court
of Karnataka   AND:

               1.   SRI. SOMASHANKAR
                    S/O LATE HUCHHAIAH
                    AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS
                    R/AT NO.243, NAGARBHAVI MAIN ROAD
                    PATTEGARAPALYA, BDA LAYOUT
                    BANGALORE-560 047.
                                                        ...RESPONDENT
               (BY SRI. PUNEETH K, ADV.,)

                    THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
               HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE
               LEARNED    SINGLE    JUDGE    DATED    07/02/2019  IN
               W.P.NO.23600/2018 (BDA).

                    THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
               DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                               -2-
                                           WA No.1761 of 2019




                         JUDGMENT

This intra court appeal emanates from an order dated

07.04.2018 passed by learned Single Judge by which writ

petition preferred by the respondent (hereinafter referred to

as 'the Allottee' for short) has been allowed.

2. Facts giving rise to filing of this appeal briefly

stated are that a BDA site was allotted to one Mr.Krishna

(hereinafter referred to as 'the original allottee' for short) on

30.01.2001. The Bangalore Development Authority

(hereinafter referred to as 'the Authority' for short) handed

over the possession of the aforesaid site to the original

allottee on 20.05.2002 and a lease cum sale agreement was

executed by the authority on 14.09.2002. The original

allottee sold the site by a registered sale deed dated

26.11.2013 to the allottee.

3. However, a reasonable demand was made to the

allotttee by the authority. The authority in pursuance of an

illegal demand made payment to the authority. Thereafter,

the allottee filed a writ petition seeking a direction to the

authority to pay the excess amount paid by him to the

WA No.1761 of 2019

authority in ignorance of law. The learned Single Judge by

an order dated 07.02.2019 has inter alia directed the

authority to refund all the excess money recovered from the

allottee within a period of eight weeks. In the aforesaid

factual background, this appeal has been filed.

4. Learned counsel for the appellant submitted that

the learned Single Judge ought to have appreciated that

Rule 14 of the Bangalore Development Authority (Allotment

of Sites) Rules, 1984 contains a stipulation with regard to

restriction of conditions on sale of sites. It is submitted that

since the original allottee had sold the site within a period of

ten years, the authority was entitled to recover the amount

from the allottee. On the other hand, learned counsel for the

respondent has supported the order passed by learned

Single Judge.

5. We have considered the submissions made on

both sides and have perused the record. Before proceeding

further, it is apposite to take note of Rule 14 of the Rules,

which reads as under:

WA No.1761 of 2019

14. Restrictions, conditions on sales of sites. - (1) The allottee shall not alienate the site within the lease period of ten years except mortgaging the site in favour of Government of India or the State Government or any financial institutions for the purpose of securing loan for the construction of building.

(2) If the site is alienated within the lease period except for the purpose specified in sub-rule (1), the authority after a due notice to the lessee, shall cancel the allotment, resume the site and forfeit the amount paid by the lessee.

(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in these rules if the lessee applies for reasons beyond his control or by reasons of his insolvency or impecuniosities to sell the site or the site with the building constructed thereupon, the authority may, with the previous approval of the Government either.-

(a) require him to surrender the site, whereupon no building is constructed. The authority after such

WA No.1761 of 2019

surrender shall pay to the lessee the allotted value of the site together with the interest at the rate of 12% per annum thereon;

(b) where the building is constructed on the site so allotted the Authority shall permit him to sell the building provided the lessee pays to the authority an amount calculated at 12% per annum on the allotted value of the site.

6. From perusal of the aforesaid Rule, it is evident

that the same contains a stipulation with regard to non

alienation within a period of ten years. In the instant case,

the sites was allotted to the original allottee on 30.01.2001

and a lease cum sale agreement was executed by the

authority in favour of the original allottee on 14.09.2002

and thereafter, the original allottee sold the site to the

allottee by a registered sale deed dated 26.11.2013.

Therefore, Rule 14 of the Rules had no application to the

facts of the case as the site has been alienated beyond a

period of ten years. The Bangalore Development Authority is

WA No.1761 of 2019

a statutory body constituted under the provisions of

Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976 and is a

instrumentality of the State. It is supposed to act under a

fair, rational and reasonable manner. It has been

constituted for the benefit of the public in general. The order

passed by learned Single Judge is eminently just and legal,

which does not call for any interference in this intra court

appeal.

For the aforementioned reasons, the appeals fails and

is hereby dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

SS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter