Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2517 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 May, 2023
-1-
WP No. 9717 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MAY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S DIXIT
WRIT PETITION NO. 9717 OF 2023 (GM-POLICE)
BETWEEN:
M/S. MUTHOOT FINANCE LTD.,
KALYADURG BRANCH, KALYADURG,
ANANTHAPUR DIST,
ANDHRAPRADESH - 515 761.
REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORIZED SIGNATORY
SRI HARI KUMARA M S/O MAHALINGAPPA R
REGISTERED UNDER COMPANIES ACT 1956
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. VENKATARAMANA K S.,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE OF KARNATAKA
REPRESENTED BY ITS
HOME SECRETARY,
Digitally signed
by SHARADA VIDHANA SOUDHA,
VANI B BANGALORE-560 001.
Location: HIGH
COURT OF 2. MOLAKALMUR POLICE
KARNATAKA BY ITS STATION HOUSE OFFICER (PSI)
MOLAKALMUR, CHITRADURGA DIST,
REPRESENTED BY
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR OF
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT BUILDINGS,
BANGALORE-560 001.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT.RASHMI PATEL., AGA)
-2-
WP No. 9717 of 2023
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO 1.
QUASHING THE NOTICE DTD 14.04.2023 PASSED BY R-2 VIDE
ANNX- N AND P2 AND ETC.,
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
The subject matter of this petition is substantially
similar to the one treated by this Court in
W.P.No.15561/2022 (GM-Police) between M/S.MUTHOOT
FINANCE LTD., VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA disposed off on
04.08.2022.
2. A Co-ordinate Bench of this Court in
W.P.No.22441/2022 (GM-Police) between M/S.MUTHOOT
FINANCE LTD., VS. STATE OF KARNATAKA disposed off on
15.11.2022 at paras 2 & 3 of the said judgment has
observed as under:
"2. A perusal of the order passed on 14.10.2022,the notice does not in effect indicate anything contrary to what is passed. The only observation is that the writ petition is dismissed and therefore, the gold articles are directed to be produced for investigation. This Court has permitted production of gold articles for investigation, but the Investigating Officer cannot seize the same.
WP No. 9717 of 2023
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that he is co-operating with the investigation and indication of dismissal of the petition should not lead to seizure of the gold articles. This Court has clearly held that the gold articles cannot be seized and therefore, the Investigating Officer cannot seize the gold articles, but can examine the same by summoning it for the purpose of investigation."
3. A Division Bench of this Court in W.A.Nos.932-
933/1974 between A.V.VINODA & ANOTHER Vs. STATE OF
KARNATAKA BY ITS COMMISSIONER & SECRETARY,
disposed of on 11.12.1974, has held that the Court should
treat the like-cases alike and if relief is granted to a
litigant it has to be extended to a similarly situated litigant
as well, there being no derogatory circumstances.
In view of the above, this Writ petition is disposed off
granting relief to the Petitioner as has been granted in the
cognate petition with the same terms & conditions.
Sd/-
JUDGE Snb/
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!