Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri.Sidharth Sainath vs Mrs.Siri Manjunath
2023 Latest Caselaw 3796 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3796 Kant
Judgement Date : 28 June, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Sri.Sidharth Sainath vs Mrs.Siri Manjunath on 28 June, 2023
Bench: Alok Aradhe, Anant Ramanath Hegde
                                           -1-
                                                  NC: 2023:KHC:22332-DB
                                                     MFA No.6639 of 2021
                                                 C/W MFA No.4330 of 2022




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                         DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023

                                        PRESENT
                         THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
                                           AND
                    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
                    MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.6639 OF 2021 (FC)
                                           C/W
                    MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4330 OF 2022 (FC)


               IN MFA NO.6639 OF 2021
Digitally      BETWEEN:
signed by
RUPA V         1.    SMT. SIRI MANJUNATH
Location:            W/O SIDHARTH SAINATH
High Court           AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS
of Karnataka         RESIDING AT SNEHA SRI
                     DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD
                     NEW EXTENSION, KUNIGAL-572130.
                                                             ...APPELLANT
               (BY SRI. RIYAZ PASHA K, ADV.,)

               AND:

               1.    SRI. SIDHARTH SAINATH
                     S/O M.J. SAINATH
                     AGED ABOUT 33 YEARS
                     RESIDING AT NO.B-1
                     BEHIND NEW KANTHARAJURS ROAD
                     KUVEMPUNAGAR, MYSURU-570023.
                                                            ...RESPONDENT
               (BY SRI. Y. RAJENDRA PRASAD SHETTY, ADV.,)
                               -2-
                                        NC: 2023:KHC:22332-DB
                                           MFA No.6639 of 2021
                                       C/W MFA No.4330 of 2022



       THIS MFA IS FILED U/S.19(1) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT,
AGAINST    THE     JUDGMENT      AND    DECREE    DT.27.10.2021
PASSED IN MC NO.246/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE II
ADDITIONAL       PRL.   JUDGE,    FAMILY     COURT,   MYSURU,
ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/S.13(1)(ib) OF THE HINDU
MARRIAGE ACT, 1955.


IN MFA NO.4330 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
1.   SRI. SIDHARTH SAINATH
     S/O M.J. SAINATH
     AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS
     RESIDING AT NO.B-1
     BEHIND NEW KANTHARAJURS ROAD
     KUVEMPUNAGAR, MYSURU-570023.
                                               .... APPELLANT
(BY SRI. Y. RAJENDRA PRASAD SHETTY, ADV.,)
AND:
1.   MRS. SIRI MANJUNATH
     W/O SIDHARTH SAINATH
     AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
     RESIDING AT SNEHA SRI
     DR. RAJKUMAR ROAD
     NEW EXTENSION, KUNIGAL-572130.
                                            .... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. RIYAZ PASHA K, ADV.,)


       THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 19(1) OF FAMILY COURTS ACT,
AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.10.2021
PASSED IN MC NO.246/2020 ON THE FILE OF THE II
ADDITIONAL       PRL.   JUDGE,    FAMILY     COURT,   MYSURU,
ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED UNDER SECTION 13(1)(ia) OF
THE HINDU MARRIAGE ACT.
                            -3-
                                  NC: 2023:KHC:22332-DB
                                     MFA No.6639 of 2021
                                 C/W MFA No.4330 of 2022



     THESE APPEALS COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,

ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


                      JUDGMENT

Parties along with their counsel are present.

These appeals have been filed against judgment

dated 27.10.2021 passed by the Family Court in

M.C.No.246/2020 by which petition filed by the

respondent - husband under Section 13(1)(ia) of the

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 (hereinafter referred to as 'the

Act') has been allowed and the wife is held to be entitled

to a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- on account of permanent

alimony and the petition filed by the respondent -

husband under Section 13(1)(ib) of the Act has been

dismissed.

2. Learned counsel for the parties, while inviting

the attention of this Court to the compromise petition

filed on behalf of the parties, submit that the dispute

NC: 2023:KHC:22332-DB MFA No.6639 of 2021 C/W MFA No.4330 of 2022

between them has been amicably resolved. The terms

and conditions of the settlement read as under:

"4. a) The respondent/husband has issued a cheque for a sum of Rs.15,00,000/- (Fifteen Lakhs) by cheque bearing No.065119 dated 20.06.2023 drawn on Bank of India, Kuvempu Nagar Branch, Mysore, Karnataka-570023, in favour of Mrs. Siri Manjunath/appellant/wife as permanent Alimony paid by the Siri Sidharth Sainanath/husband.

b) The respondent/husband Sri. Sidharth Sainath shall transfer one site to the appellant/wife name Mrs.Siri Manjunath, bearing site No.14, formed in Sy.No.412, LN No.126/1984-85 (Green Stay Layout) Panchayath Khata Janjar No.1028/863, measuring East to West by 40 feet and North to South by 60 feet, situated at Thandavapura Village, Chikkayynachatra Hobli, Nanjangud Taluk, a bounded to the:

NC: 2023:KHC:22332-DB MFA No.6639 of 2021 C/W MFA No.4330 of 2022

North by: Road South by: Site No.22 East by: Site No.15 West by: Site No.13

c) The respondent/husband shall also transfer another site measuring 10010 Sq.feet out of 14.120 feet to the daughter of the appellant and respondent Miss. Sia Sidharth, being minor, represented by the appellant/wife, a site bearing No.32A, situated at Nanjangud Taluk, Chikkayyanachatra Hobli, Thandavapura Village, Khata Janja 945, bounded to the:

North by: site South by: Site No.32B of M.J. Sainath East by: Remaining Site No.32A West by: Road

5. The site is presently stands in the name of mother of the respondent/husband, The site will remain in the name of Miss. Sia Sidharth

NC: 2023:KHC:22332-DB MFA No.6639 of 2021 C/W MFA No.4330 of 2022

till she reaches the age of majority, thereafter, she will get the absolute right to possess or sell the same. The site you will possession will give to the mother of Sia today.

6. Both the parties have no claim from each other whatsoever, in future. The appellant and respondent have agreed that they have arrived at this settlement on their own will and wish and there is no coercion, undue influence or fraud from anyone to arrive at the above settlement.

7. The Possession of the said site shall be handed over to the Second Party i.e., Siri, Manjunath and continues to be in possession till Miss Sia Siddarth attains majority."

3. In view of the aforesaid compromise arrived at

between the parties, judgment and decree dated

NC: 2023:KHC:22332-DB MFA No.6639 of 2021 C/W MFA No.4330 of 2022

27.10.2021 passed in M.C.No.246/2020 insofar as it

dissolves the marriage between the parties, is affirmed.

Accordingly, the appeals are disposed of in terms of

the compromise arrived at between the parties.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

RV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter