Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Smt Devamma vs Deputy Director
2023 Latest Caselaw 3685 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3685 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 June, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Smt Devamma vs Deputy Director on 26 June, 2023
Bench: Alok Aradhe, Anant Ramanath Hegde
                                         -1-
                                                 NC: 2023:KHC:21943-DB
                                                     WA No.1335 of 2021




                    IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                        DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
                                       PRESENT
                        THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
                                         AND
                    THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
                          WRIT APPEAL NO.1335 OF 2021 (S-DIS)
               BETWEEN:

               1.   SMT. DEVAMMA
                    W/O B.S. RAJAPPA
Digitally
signed by           AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS
RUPA V              R/AT MUSANDIHAL VILLAGE
Location:           GODABANALA POST, CHITRADURGA TALUK
High Court          CHITRADURGA DISTRICT - 577555.
of Karnataka                                               ...APPELLANT
               (BY SRI. GURUMURTHY M, ADV.,)
               AND:

               1.   DEPUTY DIRECTOR
                    DEPARTMENT OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN
                    DEVELOPMENT
                    ZILLA BALABHAVAN AREA
                    NEAR STADIUM, CHITRADURGA - 577501.

               2.   CHILD DEVELOPMENT PLANNING OFFICER
                    DEPT. OF WOMEN AND CHILDREN DEVELOPMENT
                    ZILLA PANCHAYAT, BALABHAVAN AREA
                    NEAR ONAKEOBAVVA STADIUM, CHITRADURGA
                    CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 577501.

               3.   SRI. SIDDALINGAPPA M C
                    S/O CHANNABASAPPA
                    AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS
                    RESIDING AT MUSANDIHAL VILLAGE
                    GODABANHAL POST, CHITRADURGA
                    CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 577555.
                           -2-
                                NC: 2023:KHC:21943-DB
                                    WA No.1335 of 2021




4.   SRI. G. KANTARJU (GOWDRA)
     S/O REVANSIDDAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS
     R/AT MUSANDIHAL VILLAGE
     GODABANAHAL POST, CHITRADURGA
     CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 577555.

5.   SRI. BAIRAPPA M.B.
     S/O BAJJI BASAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 73 YEARS
     R/AT MUSANDIHAL VILLAGE
     GODABANAHAL POST, CHITRADURGA
     CHITRADURGA DISTRICT 577555.

                                       ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. B. RAJENDRA PRASAD, HCGP)

     THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S 4 OF THE KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT
AND ORDER DATED 19.07.2021 PASSED BY THE LEARNED
SINGLE JUDGE IN W.P. NO.53182/2018 AND ALLOW THE WRIT
PETITION FILED BY THE APPELLANT IN ENTIRETY IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE. PASS SUCH OTHER ORDERS AS THIS
HON BLE COURT DEEMS FIT AND PROPER.

     THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING,
THIS DAY, ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                     JUDGMENT

This intra Court appeal under Section 4 of the

Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, has been filed by the

appellant against an order dated 19.07.2021 passed by

the learned Single Judge by which the writ petition

preferred by the appellant challenging the order dated

NC: 2023:KHC:21943-DB WA No.1335 of 2021

16.12.2015 by which her services were terminated from

the post of Anganawadi Assistant, has been dismissed.

2. Facts giving rise to filing of this appeal briefly

stated are that the appellant was appointed on 09.04.1996

as an Anganawadi Assistant in Musandihal Village,

Godabanahal Post, Chitradurga District. It appears that

some complaints were made against appellant with regard

to her behaviour. Thereafter, memorandum dated

31.12.2014 was issued to the appellant by which she was

warned about her conduct. Thereafter, a show cause

notice dated 26.02.2015 was issued to the appellant for

remaining unauthorisedly absent from her duties. The

appellant neither supplied any reply to the aforesaid notice

nor even after a lapse of eight months she attended her

duties and remained unauthorisedly absent. Thereafter, a

final notice dated 16.10.2015 was issued. The appellant

neither responded to the aforesaid final notice nor

returned for duties. Thereupon, by an order dated

NC: 2023:KHC:21943-DB WA No.1335 of 2021

16.12.2015, the services of the appellant were terminated.

The appellant challenged the aforesaid order in a writ

petition before the learned Single Judge who by an order

dated 19.07.2021, has dismissed the writ petition.

3. The learned Single Judge, from the conduct of the

appellant in not responding to the notices and in remaining

continuously unauthorisedly absent for a period of more

than eight months without any intimation, has rightly

concluded that the appellant had voluntarily abandoned

her services. Therefore, we do not find any ground to

differ with the view taken by the learned Single Judge.

In the result, the appeal fails and is hereby

dismissed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

RV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter