Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Jadeswamy @ Naveen (Accused No.2) vs The State Through By ...
2023 Latest Caselaw 3655 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3655 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 June, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Jadeswamy @ Naveen (Accused No.2) vs The State Through By ... on 23 June, 2023
Bench: Sreenivas Harish Kumar
                                                -1-
                                                         NC: 2023:KHC:21781
                                                          CRL.A No. 434 of 2023




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                            DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2023

                                             BEFORE
                    THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SREENIVAS HARISH KUMAR
                               CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 434 OF 2023


                   Between:

                   Jadeswamy @ Naveen (Accused No.2)
                   S/o. Nagaraj,
                   Aged about 29 years,
                   R/at M.T.Doddi Village,
                   (Mari Thimmegowda Doddi),
                   Hannuru Taluk,
                   Chamarajanagara District - 571439
                                                                     ...Appellant
                   (By Sri P.Mahadevaswamy, Advocate)

                   And:

                   1.    The State through
Digitally signed         By Byatrayanapura Police Station
by VEERENDRA             Kengeri Gate Sub-Division,
KUMAR K M
                         Bengaluru
Location: HIGH
COURT OF                 Rep. by State Public Prosecutor,
KARNATAKA                Attached High Court Building,
                         Ambedkar Veedi, Bengaluru-560001

                   2.    Kumar
                         S/o. Late Bommerai,
                         Aged about 33 years,
                         No.7/1, 5th Cross, 1st Main,
                         Byatarayanapura, Mysuru Road,
                         Bengaluru-560026
                                                                  ...Respondents
                   (By Smt. Rashmi Jadhav, HCGP for R1;
                    R2 - Served. Unrepresented.)
                                -2-
                                       NC: 2023:KHC:21781
                                         CRL.A No. 434 of 2023




      This Criminal Appeal is filed u/s.14(a)(2) of SC/ST (POA)
Act, praying to enlarge him on bail in Spl.C.No.201/2020
registered at Byatarayanapura Police, for the offence p/u/s 302
r/w 34 of IPC and section 3(2)(v) of SC/ST (POA) Act pending
on the file of LXX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge and
Special Judge, (CCH-71), Bengaluru.

      This Criminal Appeal, coming on for admission, this day,
the court delivered the following:

                          JUDGMENT

Heard Sri P.Mahadeva Swamy learned counsel

for the appellant and Smt. Rashmi Jadhav, learned

High Court Government Pleader for the respondent

No.1-State.

2. This is an appeal filed under Section

14(A)(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled

Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act challenging

the order dated 15.02.2023 on an application filed

under Section 439 of Cr.P.C., in Spl.Case

No.201/2020.

3. The appellant is accused No.2 before the

trial court and he moved the trial court for bail on

several grounds including the ground touching the

NC: 2023:KHC:21781 CRL.A No. 434 of 2023

merits of the case. The trial court dismissed the

said application holding that there are no changed

circumstances.

4. Sri P.Mahadeva Swamy submits that the

mother of the appellant is suffering from Cancer

and this ground can be considered for enlarging

the appellant on bail. In para 7 of the

memorandum of appeal, it is generally stated that

the parents of the appellant are suffering from

ailments and there is no reference of specific

ailment of the appellant's mother. If according to

the appellant, his presence is necessary for taking

care of his mother who is suffering from Cancer,

that ground should have been distinctly urged

before the trial court by producing relevant

documents. In this view of the matter, I do not

find any reason to entertain this appeal. Therefore

appeal is dismissed.

NC: 2023:KHC:21781 CRL.A No. 434 of 2023

However liberty is granted to the appellant to

approach the trial court with a fresh application for

bail along with medical documents pertaining to

his mother.

Sd/-

JUDGE

KMV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter