Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3521 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 June, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:21180
MFA No. 6932 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 6932 OF 2014 (CPC)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. RAJAMMA
SINCE DEAD BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVE.,
1(a) GOPAL
S/O LATE GOVINDASWAMY,
AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS,
R/AT. RAGHAVENDRA COLONY,
KRISHNAPPA LAYOUT,
CHAMARAJPET,
BANGALORE-560 018.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. ZULFIKIR KUMAR SHAFI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
Digitally signed
by SHARANYA T 1. SMT. MUDDAMMA
Location: HIGH MAJOR,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA W/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA,
2. SRI GOVINDA RAJU
MAJOR,
S/O LATE VENKATESHAPPA,
BOTH ARE RESIDING AT
PREMISES NO.52,
DEVANATHACHAR STREET,
5TH CROSS, 5TH MAIN,
CHAMARAJPET,
BANGALORE-560 018
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:21180
MFA No. 6932 of 2014
3. SMT. JAYAMMA
MAJOR,
W/O LATE REVANNA
4. SRI SOMASHEKAR
MAJOR,
S/O LATE REVANNA
5. SRI JAYANNA
MAJOR,
S/O LATE REVANNA
6. SMT LAKSHMI
MAJOR,
D/O LATE REVANNA
7. SRI HEMANTH
MAJOR,
S/O LATE REVANNA
ALL ARE RESIDING
AT KAIWARA,
CHINTHAMANI TALUK
KOLAR DISTRICT-563 125
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. N.R.NAIK, ADVOCATE FOR R1 AND R2 [THROUGH VC]
SRI RAMESH KUMAR R.V., ADVOCATE FOR R3
VIDE ORDER DATED 08.08.2016
NOTICE TO R4 TO R7 ARE DISPENSED WITH)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/O 43 RULE 1(d) OF CPC, AGAINST
THE ORDER DATED 18.08.2014 PASSED ON MISCELLANEOUS
NO.64/2003 ON THE FILE OF THE IX ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL &
SESSIONS JUDGE, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE
MISC.NO.64/2003 FILED U/O 9 R.13 OF CPC.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:21180
MFA No. 6932 of 2014
JUDGMENT
Learned counsel for R1 and R2 and learned counsel for
R3, are present.
2. On an earlier occasion i.e., on 06.06.2023, both
counsel were absent. However, this Court taking into note of
the absence of both the counsel, in the ends of justice, one
more opportunity was given to them and also it is made clear
that if the learned counsel for the appellant does not appear on
the next date of hearing, the appeal will be dismissed for non-
prosecution since it is an appeal of the year 2014.
3. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of
the appellant. In spite of specific direction, the learned counsel
for the appellant is not pursuing the matter diligently. Hence,
the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
CP
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!