Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3398 Kant
Judgement Date : 16 June, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:20904-DB
RP No.30 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
REVIEW PETITION NO.30 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. SUNITHA
D/O LATE Y.C. MUNISWAMAIAH
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
R/AT YELAVARA VILLAGE
Digitally KAMADENAHALLI POST, KASABA HOBLI
signed by
RUPA V KOLAR TQ AND DIST 563126.
Location: ...PETITIONER
High Court (BY SRI. SKANDA R.K. RAO, ADV., FOR
of Karnataka
SRI. T.N. VISWANATHA, ADV.,)
AND:
1. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
DIVISIONAL OFFICE NO.1
CODE NO.07100, PB NO.2743/2
JELLITTA TOWERS, MISSION ROAD
BENGALURU-27.
NOW REPTD BY
THE REGIONAL MANAGER
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD.,
REGIONAL OFFICE, NO.5 AND 6 FLOOR
KRISHI BHAVAN, NRUPATHUNGA ROAD
BENGALURU-01.
2. SMT. PAVITHRA
W/O LATE Y.M. SRINIVAS
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS.
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:20904-DB
RP No.30 of 2023
3. KUM. Y.S. VAISHNAVI
D/O LATE Y.M. SRINIVAS
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS.
RESP. NOS.2 & 3 ARE
R/AT DOOR NO.2585, KRISHNA NILAYA
SANTHE BEEDHI, SOMESHWARAPALYA
MULBAGAL TOWN, KOLAR DISTRICT-563131.
PRESENTLY
R/AT YELAVARA VILALGE
KAMADENAHALLI POST
KASABA HOBLI
KOLAR TQ AND DIST-563 126.
4. SRI. N. ANANDA
S/O LATE RAMAIAH, MAJOR
R/AT HAROHALLI, GARDENS
NO.190/A, MADERAHALLI POST
KOLAR TALUK AND DISTRICT-563101.
...RESPONDENTS
(NOTICE NOT ORDERED IN R/O RESPONDENTS)
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII
RULE 1 OF THE CPC 1908, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE
RECORDS IN M.F.A. NO.8883/2017 AND THE IMPUGNED
ORDER DATED 22.03.2019 PASSED IN M.F.A. NO.8883/2017
ON THE FILE OF THIS HONBLE COURT MAY BE SET ASIDE
AND THIS REVIEW PETITION MAY BE ALLOWED WITH COST, IN
THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,
ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:20904-DB
RP No.30 of 2023
ORDER
This petition has been filed seeking review of the
judgment dated 22.03.2019 passed in MFA
No.8883/2017. The review petitioner is a married sister
of the deceased and she seeks review of the judgment on
the ground that she was not impleaded as respondent in
the appeal after the death of her mother.
2. The appellant not being the dependant on the
deceased is not entitled to seek review of the judgment
dated 22.03.2019 passed in MFA No.8883/2017. The
order dated 22.03.2019 neither suffers from any
jurisdictional infirmity nor any error apparent on the
face of the record warranting interference of this court
in exercise of review jurisdiction.
In the result, the review petition is dismissed.
NC: 2023:KHC:20904-DB RP No.30 of 2023
In view of dismissal of the petition, all pending
interlocutory applications also stand dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
SS
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!