Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3216 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 June, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:20188
RFA No. 2477 of 2006
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2477 OF 2006 (DEC)
BETWEEN:
1. H JAYANNA
S/O HANUMANTHAPPA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
OCC TEACHER, HBPS
GUNASAGAR, DEVANUR POST
KADUR, CHICKMAGALUR-577546.
2. SMT PARVATHAMMA
D/O KENCHAIAH
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
OCC HOUSE HOLD
R/O BELLARY CAMP
BIRUR TOWN,KADUR
CHICKMAGALUR-577546.
Digitally signed
by 3. RAJAPPA
DHANALAKSHMI S/O GAVIRANGAPPA
MURTHY
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS
Location: High
Court of OCC AGRICULTURE
Karnataka R/O BANNUR VILLAGE
SAKKARAYAPATNA HOBLI
KADUR, CHICKMAGALUR-577546.
4. RUDRAPPA
S/O GAVIRANGAPPA
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
OCC: AGRICULTURE
5. GANGAMMA
W/O CHANNAIAH
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:20188
RFA No. 2477 of 2006
OCC AGRICULTURE
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS.
6. MALLESHAPPA
S/O CHANNAIAH
OCC AGRICULTURE
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
7. RAJAPPA
S/O CHANNAIAH
OCC AGRICULTURE
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
APPELLANT Nos. 4 TO 7 ARE R/O
BANNUR VILLAGE, BELLARY CAMP
BIRUR, KADUR,
CHICKMAGALUR-575746.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. YADUNANDAN N., ADVOCATE ALONG WITH
SRI. VIGHNESHWAR S SHASTRI.,SENIOR COUNSEL)
AND:
1. RANGAIAH
S/O GUDDAIAH
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
OCC AGRICULTURE.
2. MANKAIAH
S/O RANGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
OCC AGRICULTURE.
3. THAMMAIAH
S/O RANGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS
OCC AGRICULTURE.
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:20188
RFA No. 2477 of 2006
4. GANGAIAH
S/O RANGAIAH
AGED ABAOUT 45 YEARS
OCC AGRICULTURE.
5. B R RANGAIAH
S/O RANGAIAH
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS
OCC AGRICULTURE
ALL ARE R/O BANNUR VILLAGE
SAKKARAYAPATNA HOBLI
KADUR, CHICKMAGALUR-577546
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. G S BALAGANGADHAR .,ADVOCATE FOR R4 & R5:
A[[EA; AGAOMST R1 TO R3 ARE ABATED)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC AGAINST
THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED: 19.04.2006 PASSED IN
OS.NO.233/2001 ON THE FILE OF THE C.J.(SR.DN.) KADUR,
DECREEING THE SUIT FOR DECLARATION AND PERMANENT
INJUNCTION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Mr.Y.V.Prakash, learned counsel for the appellants
submitted that inspite of his best efforts, he is unable to
get instructions from his clients and he is unable to
proceed in the matter.
NC: 2023:KHC:20188 RFA No. 2477 of 2006
The learned counsel for the respondents is present.
It appears that the appellants are not interested in
prosecuting the case. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for
non-prosecution.
In view of dismissal of appeal, pending applications,
if any, do not survive for consideration and they are
accordingly dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
DM
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!