Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3099 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 June, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:19915
CRL.A No. 25 of 2012
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE K. NATARAJAN
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.25 OF 2012
BETWEEN:
RAGHAVENDRA
AGED 20 YEARS,
S/O RAMASHETTY,
OCC: PETTY BUSINESS,
RESIDING AT NITRE VILLAGE,
GUNDLUPET TALUK,
CHAMARAJANAGAR DISTRICT.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI RAMULA K., ADVOCATE, FOR SRI P. PRASANNA KUMAR)
AND:
STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY GUNDLUPET POLICE STATION,
REPRESENTED BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT BUILDING,
Digitally signed by BENGALURU - 560 001.
LAKSHMINARAYANA ...RESPONDENT
MURTHY RAJASHRI
Location: HIGH
COURT OF (BY SRI S. VISHWA MURTHY, H.C.G.P.)
KARNATAKA
***
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 374(2) OF
CR.P.C. PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER OF
CONVICTION AND SENTENCE DATED 13-10-2011 PASSED BY THE
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, CHAMARAJANAGAR, IN S.C.
NO.34/2010 CONVICTING THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED FOR THE
OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 342, 506, 376 AND 306
OF IPC.
THIS CRIMINAL APPEAL IS COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING,
THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:19915
CRL.A No. 25 of 2012
JUDGMENT
This appeal is filed by the appellant/accused under
Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973,
for setting aside the judgment of conviction and order on
sentence dated 13-10-2011 passed by the District and
Sessions Judge, Chamarajanagar (for brevity, 'trial Court')
in Sessions Case No.34 of 2010. The trial Court sentenced
the appellant to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a
period of one year with fine of Rs.1,000/- for the offence
punishable under Section 342 of the Indian Penal Code,
1860 (for brevity, 'IPC'), rigorous imprisonment for a
period of three years with fine of Rs.2,000/- for the
offence punishable under Section 506 of the IPC, rigorous
imprisonment for a period of nine years with fine of
Rs.25,000/- for the offences punishable under Sections
376 and 306 of the IPC, with default sentences and all the
sentences were ordered to run concurrently.
2. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that
the appellant is not in contact, in spite of issuing notice
and letters to him. In the meanwhile, this Court obtained
NC: 2023:KHC:19915 CRL.A No. 25 of 2012
information from the Member Secretary, Karnataka State
Legal Services Authority, whereby, the appellant has
already undergo the sentences imposed by the trial Court
and he is released from the jail on 2-11-2018 and the Jail
Authorities have given remission for 470 days.
3. Learned High Court Government Pleader for the
respondent-State submits that the appeal has become
infructuous and the appellant's counsel also does not press
the matter.
4. On perusal of the judgment of the trial Court, the
trial Court held guilty and convicted the appellant by
examining fourteen witnesses; fourteen documents and
eleven material objects, whereby, the appellant is said to
have committed sexual assault on the deceased, due to
which, she committed suicide. The accused was arrested
on 23-1-2010 and since then, he was in custody. The
appeal came to be filed in the year 2012. Earlier Bench
heard the matter and released the matter from part-
heard. Post that, the appeal is not at all listed before the
NC: 2023:KHC:19915 CRL.A No. 25 of 2012
Court. When the matter is listed today, it is noticed that
the appellant already undergone the sentences.
Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances of the
case, I am of the view that even on merits, there is no
case for the appellant, as he has already served the
sentences.
In view of the fact that the appellant has already
undergone the sentences imposed by the trial Court, the
appeal is dismissed as not pressed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
KVK
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!