Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 3098 Kant
Judgement Date : 9 June, 2023
-1-
RFA No. 100079 of 2019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE M.G.UMA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.100079/2019 (PAR/POS)
BETWEEN:
1. VIJAYKUMAR HALALLI S/O. MONAPPA @ MOHAN,
AGE: 31 YEARS, OCC: INDIAN ARMY,
R/O: HARLAPUR VILLAGE,
AT PRPESENT R/O: MALWAD VILLAGE,
TALUK: RON, DIST: GADAG.
2. KUMARI VEENA D/O. MONAPPA HALALLI,
AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
R/O: HARLAPUR VILLAGE,
AT PRPESENT R/O: MALWAD VILLAGE,
TALUK: RON, DIST: GADAG.
3. KUMARI VIDYA D/O. MONAPPA HALALLI,
AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
R/O: HARLAPUR VILLAGE,
AT PRPESENT R/O: MALWAD VILLAGE,
Digitally TALUK: RON, DIST: GADAG.
signed by
ROHAN
HADIMANI 4. SMT.NARMADA W/O MONAPPA HALALLI,
T AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: HEALTH WORKER,
R/O: HARLAPUR VILLAGE,
AT PRPESENT R/O: MALWAD VILLAGE,
TALUK: RON, DIST: GADAG.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI D. M. BANDI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. RAMAPPA HALALLI S/O SHIVAJEPPA HALALLI,
AGE: 53 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: HARLAPUR VILLAGE,
TALUK: RON, DIST: GADAG,
-2-
RFA No. 100079 of 2019
AT PRPESENT: SAVADATTI VILLAGE,
DIST: BELAGAVI.
2. CHANDRASHEKHARAPPA,
S/O SHIVAJEPPA HALALLI,
AGE: 43 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: HARLAPUR VILLAGE,
3. LAXMIBAI HALALLI,
W/O CHANDRASHEKHARAPP,
AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
R/O: HARLAPUR VILLAGE,
TALUK: RON, DIST: GADAG.
...RESPONDENTS
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE CODE, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE
DATED 05.11.2018 PASSED IN O.S.NO.235/2016 ON THE FILE
OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GADAG,
DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR DECLARATION, PARTITION
AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellants is absent. No
representation.
The order sheet dated 26.05.2023 reads as under;
"Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. No representation is made. Office objections are not complied inspite of listing the same for the third time. I do not find any reason to adjourn the matter, however, to afford a final opportunity, list this matter on 09.06.2023."
RFA No. 100079 of 2019
Inspite of that, none of the office objections are
complied with.
The appellants are not interested in prosecuting the
appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for default i.e. for
non-prosecution.
SD/-
JUDGE
RH
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!