Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2983 Kant
Judgement Date : 7 June, 2023
-1-
COMAP No.200 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF JUNE, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
COMMERCIAL APPEAL NO.200 OF 2022 (AA)
BETWEEN:
M/S. EAGLE - MPCC (JV)
Digitally
signed by A REGISTERED FIRM AND
RUPA V HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE
Location: AT NO.16, S C S COMPLEX
High Court SOUTH CAR STREET
of TIRUCHENGODE 637211
Karnataka
NAMAKKAL DISTRICT
TAMIL NADU
COMPRISING ITS CONSTITUENTS, NAMELY,
1. EAGLE EARTH MOVERS
A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN
REPRESENTED BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR
MR. U.R. SUBRAMANIAM
SON OF MR. RAMASWAMY
AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.14, S C S COMPLEX
SOUTH CAR STREET, TIRUCHENGODE
NAMAKKAL DISTRICT, TAMIL NADU 637211.
2. M.P. CONSTRUCTION CO.
A SOLE PROPRIETORSHIP CONCERN
REPRESENTED BY ITS SOLE PROPRIETOR
MR. M. PADMANABHAN
SON OF MR. MANICKAM
AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS
HAVING HIS OFFICE AT NO 10
JAI NAGAR, 3RD STREET
-2-
COMAP No.200 of 2022
ARUMBAKKAM,
CHENNAI 600106.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. BHANUPRAKASH V.G. ADV.,)
AND:
1. THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE
OFFICER/CONSTRUCTION
SOUTH WESTERN RAILWAY
18, MILLERS ROAD, BANGALORE
CANTONMENT, BANGALORE 560046.
...RESPONDENT
---
THIS COMAP IS FILED UNDER SECTION 37 OF THE
ARBITRATION AND CONCILIATION ACT, 1996 R/W ORDER XLI
OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED
19.01.2022 PASSED IN COM.AA.NO.167/2021 BY THE
LEARNED LXXXIV ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL AND SESSIONS
JUDGE (CCH-85) (COMMERCIAL COURT) BENGALURU,
PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A & ETC.,
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
ALOK ARADHE J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This appeal under Sections 13(1) and 13(1-A) of
the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 has been filed against
an order dated 19.01.2022 passed by the Commercial
Court by which petition filed by the appellant under
Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
has been rejected.
COMAP No.200 of 2022
2. It is not in dispute that the amount in respect of
which the appellant sought the relief under Section 9 of
the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, has already been
recovered from the appellant. The validity of the action
of the respondent in recovering the amount from the
appellant shall be adjudged by the Arbitrator who may
be appointed to adjudicate the dispute.
3. At this point of time, nothing survives for
adjudication in this appeal as the amount has already
been recovered from the appellant.
The appeal is therefore disposed of.
Consequently, pending interlocutory application is
also disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE RV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!