Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2768 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 June, 2023
-1-
RSA No. 656 of 2003
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 656 OF 2003 (DEC-)
BETWEEN:
SRI. PETU
ADOPTED S/O BOMMU GOUDA
AGE: 51 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: TALAGADDE, TALUKA ANKOLA,
DIST: UTTARA KANNADA.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SHIVARAJ S BALLOLI, ADVOCATE-ABSENT)
AND:
1. SRI. NINGU S/O SUKUR GOUDA
SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY HIS LRS
1.A SMT. SAVITRI
W/O NINGU GOWDA
Digitally
SUJATA signed by AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
SUBHASH SUJATA
PAMMAR SUBHASH R/O: BELSE, TQ: ANKOLA,
PAMMAR
DIST: UTTARA KANNADA-581353.
1.B SMT. SHALINI
S/O NAGAPPA GOUDA
AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O: AT POST BELSE, TQ: ANKOLA.
DIST: UTTARA KANNADA-581353.
1.C SMT. SHANA @ SHYAMALA
W/O LOKESH GOUDA,
AGE: 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O: AT POST BELSE, TQ: ANKOLA.
-2-
RSA No. 656 of 2003
DIST: UTTARA KANNADA-581353.
1.D SUKRU
S/O NINGU GOUDA
AGE: 30 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: AT POST BELSE, TQ: ANKOLA,
DIST: UTTARA KANNADA-581353.
1.E SURESH
S/O NINGU GOUDA
AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
R/O: AT POST BELSE, TQ: ANKOLA,
DIST: UTTARA KANNADA-581353.
1.F GULABI
W/O RAMESH GOUDA
AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O:BIJJUR, AT POST BIJJUR,
TQ: GOKARNA,
DIST: UTTARA KANNADA-581326.
...RESPONDENTS
(R1(A), R1(B), R1(C), R1(E), R1(F)-ARE SERVED;
R1(D)-HELD SUFFICIENT)
THIS RSA FILED U/S.100 OF CPC AGAINST THE JUDGMENT
AND DECREE DATED 9.4.2003 PASSED IN R.A.NO.71/2000 ON
THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE, SR.DN., KARWAR, U.K.,
ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 20.6.2000 PASSED IN O.S.NO.86/1993 ON THE
FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE, JR.DN., ANKOLA.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
RSA No. 656 of 2003
ORDER
There is no representation on behalf of the appellant.
Even during morning hours, there was no representation.
The appeal is pending since 2003. Inspite of lapse of 20
years, no interest is being shown to prosecute the appeal.
On 22.08.2023, this Court passed peremptory order granting
time as a final chance. Inspite of the same, the appellant has
not shown any interest in prosecuting the appeal. It is
evident from the records that the appellant is not interested
in prosecuting the matter. As such, the appeal stands
dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
YAN
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!