Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2765 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 June, 2023
-1-
RSA No. 100100 of 2014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO. 100100 OF 2014 (DEC/INJ)
BETWEEN:
BASAPPA S/O.MALLAPPA AMRAD
SINCE DECEASED REP. BY HIS LRS
1. SMT. HOLEYAVVA W/O. BASAPPA AMRAD
AGE: 66 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE
R/O. HAMPASAGAR, H B HALLI TALUK,
BELLARY DISTRICT-583101.
2. SMT. FAKKIRAVVA W/O. BHARAMAPPA AMRAD
AGE: 61 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE
R/O. HAMPASAGAR, H B HALLI TALUK,
BELLARY DISTRICT-583101.
SUJATA
SUBHASH
PAMMAR ...APPELLANTS
Digitally signed
by SUJATA
(BY SRI. S M KALWAD, ADVOCATE)
SUBHASH
PAMMAR
AND:
GANGAVVA W/O. YELLAPPA AMRAD
SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS
1A. GUNDAVVA W/O. MUDAKAPPA AMARAD
@ AADI, AGE: 67 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD.
2. SMT. FAKKIRAVVA W/O. LAXMAPPA AMRAD
AGE: 72 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE.
-2-
RSA No. 100100 of 2014
3. SRI. LAXMAPPA AMRAD
AGE: 49 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE.
4. MUDAKAPPA S/O. LAXMAPPA AMRAD
AGE: 45 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE.
5. KOTRAPPA S/O. LAXMAPPA AMRAD
AGE: 42 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE.
6. MALLAPPA S/O.LAXMAPPA AMRAD
AGE: 49 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE
7. BASAPPA S/O. LAXMAPPA AMRAD
AGE:40 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURE
ALL ARE R/O: HAMPASAGAR,
H.B.HALLI TALUK,
BELLARY DISTRICT-583101.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. GANGADHAR J M & SRI. PRAVEEN P TARIKAR ADVOCATES
FOR R1(A), R2, R5 TO R7;
APPEAL AGAINST R3 & R4-ABATED)
THIS RSA FILED U/S. 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT &
DECREE DTD: 11.06.2013 PASSED IN R.A.NO.43/2012 ON THE FILE
OF THE PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC., HOSPET,
DISMISSING THE APPEAL, FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DTD: 16.04.2012 AND THE DECREE PASSED IN O.S.NO.
85/2008 ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC., AT
HAGARIBOMMANAHALLI. DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR
DECLARATION & INJUNCTION.
-3-
RSA No. 100100 of 2014
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
A memo is filed along with receipt for having paid the
costs.
Learned counsel for the appellants has also filed a
memo reporting death of both the appellants. It is stated in
the memo that the appellant No.2 died on 02.04.2017 while
it is submitted that the date of death of appellant No.1 is yet
to be asserted. However, he submits that appellant No.1 died
in 2018 or 2019 itself. The legal heirs of deceased appellants
have not shown any interest in prosecuting the appeal.
Hence, the appeal filed by both the appellants stands
dismissed as abated.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!