Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4612 Kant
Judgement Date : 18 July, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:24984
RFA No. 2067 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE H.B.PRABHAKARA SASTRY
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 2067 OF 2017 (PAR/INJ)
BETWEEN:
Sri. N. Krishnamurthy
S/o Late Nallappa,
Aged about 69 years,
Residing at Papireddy Palya,
Yeshwanthapura Hobli,
Bengaluru North Taluk,
Bengaluru-560 072.
...Appellant
(By Sri. C. Shankar Reddy, Advocate)
AND:
Smt. Chandralekha Singh
Digitally signed D/o K.P. Singh
by
BHARATHIDEVI
K KORLAHALLI Aged about 68 years,
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka
Residing at No.40 A,
BHEL Officer Layout,
Behind Krishnappa Garden
Bengaluru-560041.
...Respondent
(By Sri. Bhadrinath R, Advocate for
GPA Holder of Respondent)
This Regular First Appeal is filed under Order XLI Rule 1
of Civil Procedure Code, praying to call for the records in
O.S.No.5105/2016 passed by the Court of XL Additional City
Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru, (CCH-41), peruse the
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:24984
RFA No. 2067 of 2017
same, hear the appellant and allow the above appeal by setting
aside the impugned judgment and decree dated 07.11.2017
passed therein and consequently dismiss the suit as against the
appellant and grant costs together with such other reliefs as
this Court deems fit to grant in the facts and circumstances of
the case to meet the ends of justice.
This Regular First Appeal coming on for Orders through
Physical Hearing/Video Conferencing, this day, the Court made
the following:
ORDER
Learned counsels from both side present physically in
the Court.
2. The learned counsel for the appellant is not aware
as to what the matter is due for today. Except making the
submission that he would do needful, he is unable to tell
as to what needful he is required to do, despite the Court
specifically asking him to mention the same.
3. In that view of the matter, when the applicant in
IA.No.1/2019 himself is not aware as to what he is
required to do and the said application is pending for
compliance of office objections, the same stands returned
for non-compliance of office objections.
4. Consequently, in view of death of the sole
appellant on 12.05.2019, which has already been brought
NC: 2023:KHC:24984 RFA No. 2067 of 2017
to the notice by filing a memo by none else than the
learned counsel for the appellant on 01.08.2019 and since
no steps have been taken to bring his legal
representatives on record, by operation of law, the Appeal
of the sole appellant stands abated.
As such, the Appeal does not survive for
consideration.
Sd/-
JUDGE
bk
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!