Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Mr. Jagadish Kumar vs The Managing Director Ksrtc
2023 Latest Caselaw 4604 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 4604 Kant
Judgement Date : 18 July, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Mr. Jagadish Kumar vs The Managing Director Ksrtc on 18 July, 2023
Bench: K S Hemalekha
                                                  -1-
                                                        NC: 2023:KHC:25091
                                                         WP No. 12928 of 2022




                        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
                              DATED THIS THE 18TH DAY OF JULY, 2023
                                              BEFORE
                           THE HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE K.S. HEMALEKHA
                           WRIT PETITION NO.12928 OF 2022 (S-KSRTC)
                   BETWEEN:

                   MR. JAGADISH KUMAR
                   AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS,
                   S/O. SRI RAJAPPA,
                   PRESENTLY WORKING AS PRINCIPAL,
                   REGIONAL TRAINING CENTRE,
                   KSRTC HASSAN DIVISION,
                   HASSAN - 573 202.
                   R/AT LAKSHMI NIVASA,
                   50 FEET ROAD, VISHWESHVARAIAH LAYOUT,
                   RING ROAD, HASSAN - 573 202.                  ... PETITIONER
                   (BY SRI NAIK V.S., ADVOCATE)
                   AND:
                   1.   THE MANAGING DIRECTOR
                        KSRTC, CENTRAL OFFICES,
                        K.H. ROAD,
                        BENGALURU - 560 027.
Digitally signed
by SHYAMALA        2.   THE CHIEF PERSONNEL MANAGER
Location: HIGH          KSRTC, CENTRAL OFFICES,
COURT OF                K.H. ROAD,
KARNATAKA               BENGALURU - 560 027.                  ... RESPONDENTS

                   (BY SMT. H.R. RENUKA, ADVOCATE)

                        THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227
                   OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE
                   ENTIRE RECORDS FROM THE RESPONDENTS PERTAINING TO
                   ANNEXURE-B AND GRANT THE PETITIONER FOLLOWING RELIEFS;
                   QUASH GENERAL ESTABLISHMENT ORDER DATED 24.06.2022 THE
                   TRUE COPY OF WHICH IS MARKED AS ANNEXURE-B ISSUED BY THE
                   SECOND RESPONDENT UNDER THE ORDER OF FIRST RESPONDENT
                   IN SO FAR IT RELATES TO THE PETITIONER SINCE THE SAME IS
                   UNJUST, ARBITRARY AND ILLEGAL AND ETC.
                                              -2-
                                                      NC: 2023:KHC:25091
                                                         WP No. 12928 of 2022




       THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING
IN 'B' GROUP, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                                        ORDER

The petitioner is seeking for the following prayers:

"a. Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, or direction quashing General Establishment Order Vide Ref.

No.PÀgÁ¸À/PÉÃPÀ/¹§âA¢/¹5/269/376/2022-23 dated

24.06.2022 the true copy of which is marked as Annexure-B issued by the second respondent under the order of first respondent in so far it relates to the petitioner since the same is unjust, arbitrary and illegal.

b. Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, or direction the first Respondent to continue the Petitioner to work as Principal, Regional Training Centre, KSRTC Hassan.

c. Grant such other relief or reliefs as deemed necessary to meet the ends of justice."

2. Learned counsel on both sides submit that the

writ petition is covered by the judgment of the Division

Bench of this Court in W.A.No.2369/2019 and

NC: 2023:KHC:25091 WP No. 12928 of 2022

connected matters disposed of on 13.04.2023. The

issues involved in this writ petition were considered by the

Division Bench of this Court by framing the following

issues:

"(i) Whether challenge to clause 3 of Government order dated 05.08.2000 issued under Section 34 of the Act is barred on the principles of res judicata or on principles analogous thereto?

(ii) Whether the order dated 23.07.2015 is an order of deputation or an order of transfer?

(iii) Whether clause 3 of the Government order dated 05.08.2000 issued under Section 34 of the Act is valid?

(iv) Whether the employees who had accepted their deputation and promotion in other Corporations earlier, can be permitted now to assail the order of deputation?

(v) Alternatively, whether deemed consent for deputation can be inferred from the conduct of the employees?"

3. Issue No.4, i.e., "Whether the employees who

had accepted their deputation and promotion in other

NC: 2023:KHC:25091 WP No. 12928 of 2022

Corporations earlier, can be permitted now to assail the

order of deputation?" was answered in the negative

holding that, the employees who have accepted their

deputation and promotion in other Corporations earlier

cannot be permitted now to assail the order of deputation.

Since the issue involved in this petition is being considered

by the Division Bench of this Court, the present petition

deserves to be disposed of in terms of the order passed by

the Division Bench of this Court in W.A.No.2369/2019

and connected matters stated supra. Accordingly, this

Court pass the following:

ORDER

(i) Writ Petition is dismissed.

(ii) The impugned order passed by respondent No.2 -

Corporation dated 24.06.2022 at Annexure - B is

hereby confirmed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

S*

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter