Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 508 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2023
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6th DAY OF JANUARY 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.1190/2017 (INJ)
BETWEEN:
1. G.P.VENKATANARASIMHAIAH,
S/O LATE PAPANNA,
AGED 70 YEARS,
2. G.V.MARUTHI,
S/O G.P.VENKATANARASIMHAIAH,
AGED 30 YEARS,
BOTH ARE R/O JAVALIPET,
GUBBI TOWN,
GUBBI TALUK - 572 216.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI.R.KOTHWAL, ADVOCATE)
AND:
NAGARAJU,
S/O LATE BYATAPPA,
AGED 55 YERS,
R/O BEHIND CHRISTIAN COLONY,
GUBBI TOWN,
GUBBI TALUK - 572 216.
... RESPONDENT
(BY SRI.YATHISH J NADIGA, ADVOCATE FOR C/R)
2
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER
SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND
DECREE DATED 19.04.2017 PASSED IN R.A. NO.61/2014
ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, GUBBI,
ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE
JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 12.11.2014 PASSED IN
O.S. NO.215/06 ON THE FILE OF THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE
AND JMFC, GUBBI.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR
ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
This Court, on 09.09.2019, adjourned the case
imposing cost of Rs.1,000/- to comply office objections by
granting two weeks' time. There was non compliance.
Again on 19.04.2022, learned counsel submitted that that
cost was paid and one week time was once again granted
to comply with the office objections. Even after lapse of
eight months, office objections are not yet complied with.
2. This appeal was filed in the year 2017. For a
period of five years there is non compliance of office
objections and hence, I do not find any reasons to again
adjourn the matter for compliance.
Hence, appeal is dismissed for non compliance of
office objections.
Sd/-
JUDGE
sac*
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!