Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 483 Kant
Judgement Date : 6 January, 2023
-1-
RP No.2 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S VISHWAJITH SHETTY
REVIEW PETITION NO.2 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1. SRI. HUCHAPPA B
AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS
S/O LATE BILLIYAPPA
R/AT NO.40/2/14, OPP CHBS LAYOUT
VIJAYANAGAR, BENGALURU-560040.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. K.N. PHANINDRA, SR. COUNSEL A/W
Digitally signed SRI. MALLIKARJUN N.K. ADV., FOR
by RUPA V SRI. SAMPATH A, ADV.,)
Location: High
Court of
Karnataka AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN
DEVELOPMENT, M S BUILDING
BANGALORE-560001.
2. THE BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KUMAR PARK WEST
BANGALORE-560020.
3. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER
BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
K P WEST, BANGALORE-560020.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SMT. NAMITHA MAHESH B.G. AGA FOR R1)
-2-
RP No.2 of 2023
THIS REVIEW PETITION IS FILED UNDER ORDER XLVII
RULE 1 READ WITH SECTION 114 OF THE CPC, PRAYING TO
CALL FOR ENTIRE RECORDS FROM THE FILE OF MAIN APPEAL
WA NO.285/2022 AND C/W MATTERS OF THIS HONBLE
COURT. REVIEW THE ORDER DATED 14.10.2022 MAIN
APPEAL WA NO.285/2022 AND CONNECTED MATTERS
DISPOSED OF BY THIS HONBLE COURT VIDE ANNEXURE-A.
CONSEQUENTLY, RESTORE THE APPEAL TO ITS FILE FOR
CONSIDERATION AFRESH & ETC.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ALOK ARADHE J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
Mr.K.N.Phanindra, learned Senior counsel for the
appellant.
This review petition has been filed seeking review
of the judgment dated 14.10.2022 passed in
W.A.No.285/2022.
2. Learned Senior counsel for the appellant
submits that a typographical error has crept in, in the
judgment dated 14.10.2022.
RP No.2 of 2023
3. It is therefore directed that the words
"W.P.No1344/2021 dated 19.06.2022" shall be
substituted by the words "W.A.No.1344/2021 dated
29.06.2022".
4. After hearing the learned Senior counsel for the
petitioner at length, we find that the judgment dated
14.10.2022 neither suffers from any jurisdictional
infirmity nor any error apparent on the face of the
record warranting interference of this Court in exercise
of review jurisdiction.
In the result, the petition fails and is hereby
dismissed.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE RV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!