Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Alamgir Shahi Idgah vs Deputy Commissioner And Chairman
2023 Latest Caselaw 1138 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1138 Kant
Judgement Date : 31 January, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Alamgir Shahi Idgah vs Deputy Commissioner And Chairman on 31 January, 2023
Bench: Anant Ramanath Hegde
                           1



        IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA

                 KALABURAGI BENCH

    DATED THIS THE 31st DAY OF JANUARY, 2023

                        BEFORE

THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE

         W.P.NO.206438/2015 (GM-WAKF)
                     C/W
         W.P.NO.206439/2015 (GM-WAKF)

In W.P.NO.206438/2015 :

BETWEEN:

Alamgir Shahi Idgah,
Jorapur Peth, Soapur Road, Vijayapur
Represented by its Chairman,
Mohammed Rafeeq S/o Moinuddin Tapal,
Age : 48 years, R/o Behind SP Office,
Sholapur Road, Vijayapur.
                                           .... Petitioner

(By Sri Ameet Kumar Deshpande Senior counsel for
    Sri Liyaqat Fareed Ustad, Advocate)

AND:

1. The Deputy Commissioner and Chairman,
   Master Plan Committee,
   Vijayapur - 586 101.

2. The Commissioner, Bijapur,
   Development Authority,
   Vijayapur -586 101.
                               2



3. The Commissioner,
   City Municipal Council,
   Vijaypur - 586 101.

4. Chief Executive Officer,
   Karnataka State Board of Wakf,
   No.6, Cunningham Road,
   Bengauru - 560 052.
                                            ... Respondents

(By Sri Shivakumar R.Tengli, AGA for R1;
    Sri S.S.Halalli Advocate for R2;
    Sri Amaresh S.Roja, Advocate for R3,
    Sri Md.Saleem Patel, Advocate for R4)

       This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227
of the Constitution of India praying to issue the writ in the
nature of certiorari and quash the common judgment and
order dated 15.04.2015 passed by the court of the V Addl.
District and Sessions Judge, Belgaum and Karnataka Wakf
Tribunal,    Belgaum      in    KWT.BIJ.SR.OS.1/2012      vide
Annexure-G.


In W.P.NO.206439/2015 :

BETWEEN:

Alamgir Shahi Idgah,
Jorapur Peth, Soapur Road, Vijayapur
Represented by its Chairman,
Mohammed Rafeeq S/o Moinuddin Tapal,
Age : 48 years, R/o Behind SP Office,
Sholapur Road, Vijayapur.
                                              .... Petitioner

(By Sri Ameet Kumar Deshpande Senior counsel for
    Sri Liyaqat Fareed Ustad, Advocate)
                               3



AND:

1. The Deputy Commissioner, Bijapur,
   Vijayapur - 586 101.

2. Superintendent of Police,
   Solapur road,
   Bijapur Vijaypur - 586 101.

3. Chief Executive Officer,
   Karnataka State Board of Wakf,
   No.6, Cunningham Road,
   Bengauru - 560 052.
                                            ... Respondents

(By Sri Shivakumar R.Tengli, AGA for R1 and 2;
    Sri P.S.Malipatil, Advocate for R3)

       This writ petition is filed under Articles 226 and 227
of the Constitution of India praying to issue the writ in the
nature of certiorari and quash the common judgment and
order dated 15.04.2015 passed by the court of the V Addl.
District and Sessions Judge, Belgaum and Karnataka Wakf
Tribunal,    Belgaum      in    KWT.BIJ.SR.OS.3/2012      vide
Annexure-G.

      These petitions coming on for Final Hearing, this day,
the court made the following:-

                          ORDER

The Division Bench of this Court in Writ Appeal

No.50239-241/2013 vide order dated 26.08.2013 has

taken a view that revision lies against the order passed by

the Wakf Tribunal under the Wakf Act, 1995.

2. Under these circumstances, for statistical

purpose writ petitions are disposed of.

3. The Registry shall convert these two writ

petitions into civil revision petitions and the petitioners are

permitted to make necessary changes to bring it in the

format of civil revision petition under sub-section (9) of

Section 83 of the Wakf Act, 1995 and the petitioners are

permitted to make necessary changes in the pleadings.

4. It is to be noticed that the matter is already

admitted and there was an interim order operating in

favour of the petitioners. Said interim order shall continue

to operate till the matter is placed before the Bench having

the roster.

5. Learned Additional Government Advocate

submits that there is compelling urgency in the matter in

view of the interim order granted.

6. In view of the urgency pleaded petitioners shall

make necessary changes in the pleadings within seven

days and Registry shall make necessary changes in the

records.

Sd/-

JUDGE

sn

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter