Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1588 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2023
-1-
WA No. 655 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR PRASANNA B. VARALE, CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ASHOK S.KINAGI
WRIT APPEAL NO. 655 OF 2022 (SC-ST)
BETWEEN:
1. SRI SHIVASHANKAR
S/O LATE SANNA KALAIAH
AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS
R/AT KORADAHALLI VILLAGE
BHAUR HOBLI
CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 111
2. SRI KUMARASWAMY
Digitally signed
AGED 43 YEARS
by R DEEPA S/O LATE SANNA KALAIAH
Location: High
Court of R/AT KORADAHALLI VILLAGE
Karnataka BHAUR HOBLI, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 111
3. SMT. MANJULA
D/O LATE SANNA KALAIAH
AGED 40 YEARS
R/AT KORADAHALLI VILLAGE
BAHUR HOBLI, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 111
4. SRI ASHOKA
AGED 36 YEARS
S/O LATE SANNA KALAIAH
-2-
WA No. 655 of 2022
R/AT KORADAHALLI VILLAGE
BAHUR HOBLI, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 111
...APPELLANTS
[(BY SRI. SIDDAMALLAPPA P. M., ADVOCATE (ABSENT)]
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
M S BUILDING
DR AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BENGALURU - 560001
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
HASSAN DISTRICT
HASSAN - 573 201
3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
HASSAN SUB DIVISION
HASSAN - 573 201
4. SMT. SUNANDAMMA
W/O LATE RAMAKRISHNE GOWDA
AGED 64 YEARS
R/AT KORADAHALLI VILLAGE
BAHUR HOBLI, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573111
5. SRI RAJESH K R
AGED 39 YEARS
S/O LATE RAMAKRISHNE GOWDA
R/AT KORADAHALLI VILLAGE
BAHUR HOBLI, CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 111
6. SMT. PADMA
D/O RAMAKRISHNE GOWDA
W/O MALLESH
AGED 44 YEARS
-3-
WA No. 655 of 2022
R/AT GUDDENAHALLI VILLAGE
DODDAGANAHALLI HOBLI
CHANNARAYAPATNA TALUK
HASSAN DISTRICT - 573 111
7. SMT. CHAITRA
D/O RAMAKRISHNE GOWDA
W/O VASANTHA
AGED 41 YEARS
R/AT BELI KOPPLU VILLAGE
SHANTIGRAMA HOBLI
HASSAN TALUK AND DISTRICT - 573 220
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. S. RAJASHEKARA, AGA FOR R1 TO R3)
THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE
KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SECURE
RECORDS IN WP NO.47426/2016 (SC-ST) AND SET ASIDE THE
ORDER DATED 17/02/2022 PASSED IN WRIT PETITION NO.
47426/2016 BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE AND ETC.
THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
CHIEF JUSTICE, DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Inspite of repeated calls, none appears for the
appellants.
2. Inspite of providing opportunities to the
appellants to remove office objections for more than 6
WA No. 655 of 2022
occasions, till date, office objections are not removed. It
clearly indicates that the appellants are not interested in
prosecuting the appeal. As such, the appeal is dismissed
for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
RD
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!