Monday, 11, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Parameshwarappa vs The State Of Karnataka
2023 Latest Caselaw 1583 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1583 Kant
Judgement Date : 24 February, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Parameshwarappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 24 February, 2023
Bench: Shivashankar Amarannavar
                                      -1-
                                               CRL.A No. 318 of 2012




              IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                DATED THIS THE 24TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023

                                     BEFORE

             THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR

                       CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 318 OF 2012

            BETWEEN:

            PARAMESHWARAPPA
            SON OF LATE CHANNAPPA
            AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS
            TRACTOR DRIVER
            R/O KODAGANUR VILLAGE
            DAVANAGERE DISTRICT.

                                                        ...APPELLANT
            (BY SRI. D P MAHESH, ADVOCATE)

            AND:

            THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Digitally BY MAYAKONDA POLICE
signed by REPRESENTED BY LEARNED STATE
SANDHYA S PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.
Location:
HIGH                                                  ...RESPONDENT
COURT OF
KARNATAKA (BY SRI.VISHWAMURTHY.S, HCGP)
                 THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.374(2) CR.P.C BY THE
            ADVOCATE    FOR THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED NO.1 PRAYING
            THAT THIS HON'BLE COURT MAY BE PLEASED TO SET ASIDE
            THE JUDGMENT OF SENTENCE DATED 19/20.01.2012 PASSED
            BY THE II ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, DAVANGERE IN
            S.C.NO.89/2010-CONVICTING THE APPELLANT/ACCUSED FOR
            THE OFFENCE P/U/S 498-A, 304-B, 306 OF IPC AND SEC. 3, 4
            AND 6 OF D.P. ACT. AND ETC.
                                    -2-
                                             CRL.A No. 318 of 2012




    THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

                            JUDGMENT

The appellant-accused No.1 has filed this appeal

challenging the judgment of conviction and order of sentence

passed in SC No.89/2010 by the II Additional Sessions Judge,

Davanagere.

2. The appellant -accused No.1 has been sentenced to

undergo rigorous imprisonment for one year and to pay fine of

Rs.1,000/- with default sentence for offence under Section

498-A of IPC; further sentenced to undergo rigorous

imprisonment for a period of seven years for the offence under

Section 304-B of IPC; further sentenced to undergo rigorous

imprisonment for a period of three years and to pay fine of

Rs.2,000/- with default sentence for offence under Section 306

of IPC; further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for

a period of five years and to pay fine of Rs.15,000/- with

default sentence for offence under Section 3 of D.P. Act; further

sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for six months

and to pay fine of Rs.2,000/- with default sentence for offence

under Section 4 of D.P. Act and further sentenced to undergo

CRL.A No. 318 of 2012

rigorous imprisonment for a period of six months and to pay

fine of Rs.5,000/- with default sentence for offence under

Section 6 of D.P. Act. The trial Court has ordered that all

substantive sentences shall run concurrently and also given

benefit of set of under Section 428 of Cr.P.C.

3. This appeal has been filed on 19-03-2012. In this

appeal, no IA is filed seeking suspension of sentence. This

Court, by its order dated 08-02-2023 directed the Registrar

(Judicial) to ascertain as to whether the appellant-accused No.1

has completed his sentence or not, from the concerned Jail

Authorities.

4. The Registrar General has received a communication

from Superintendent of Central Prison, Ballari dated

17-02-2023, where-under, it is intimated that appellant-

accused No.1 Parameshwarappa, son of Late Channappa, who

has been convicted in SC No.89/2010 by the II Additional

District and Sessions Judge, Davanagere, has completed his

sentence and has been released on 05-02-2018.

CRL.A No. 318 of 2012

5. In view of the appellant-accused No.1 completing his

sentence, the appeal does not survive for consideration.

Hence, the appeal is disposed of.

Sd/-

JUDGE

tsn*

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter