Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 1542 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 February, 2023
-1-
CRL.RP No. 1573 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R. NATARAJ
CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 1573 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
SRI. RAVINDRA K. R,
S/O. RAGHUPATHI GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURIST,
R/O. KEREHALLI VILLAGE,
KEREHALLI HOBLI, RIPPENPETE POST,
HOSANAGARA TALUK,
SHIVAMOGGA - 577 418.
...PETITIONER
(BY SRI. GANESHA R, ADVOCATE)
AND:
RAJENDRA H. S,
S/O. SHEKARAPPA GOWDA,
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
OCC: AGRICULTURIST,
Digitally
signed by HEBAILU IN DUMMA VILLAGE,
SUMA BHEEMANAKERE POST,
Location: KASABA HOBLI, HOSANAGARA TALUK,
HIGH COURT
OF SHIVAMOGGA - 577 418.
KARNATAKA ...RESPONDENT
(BY SRI. NARAYAN M. NAIK, ADVOCATE)
THIS CRL.RP IS FILED U/S.397 R/W SECTION 401 OF CR.P.C
PRAYING TO A. SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND ORDER DATED
25.08.2022 PASSED BY THE V ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, SHIVAMOGGA SITTING AT SAGAR IN
CRL.A.NO.10036/2021 WHEREBY CONFIRMED THE JUDGMENT AND
ORDER OF CONVICTION DATED 30.11.2021 PASSED BY THE COURT
OF THE PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HOSANAGARA IN
C.C.NO.39/2018.
-2-
CRL.RP No. 1573 of 2022
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER
I.A.No.1/2023 is filed for compounding the offence
committed by the petitioner.
2. The petitioner and the respondent have agreed to
settle the dispute and the respondent has agreed to receive a
sum of Rs.1,00,000/- towards full and final settlement of the
amount payable under the cheque.
3. The parties have appeared through video
conference and they are identified by their respective counsels.
4. Learned counsel for the respondent acknowledges
the receipt of the entire sum of Rs.1,00,000/- including the
amount deposited before the trial Court.
5. In view of the above, since the settlement arrived
at between the parties is just and proper, I.A.No.1/2023 is
allowed. Consequently, this revision petition is allowed.
The offence committed by the petitioner under Section
138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is compounded.
CRL.RP No. 1573 of 2022
As a result, the judgment of conviction dated 30.11.2021
passed by the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Hosanagara in
C.C.No.39/2018 and the judgment dated 25.08.2022 passed by
the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Shivamogga,
Sitting at Sagar in Crl.A.no.10036/2021 are set aside.
The petitioner is acquitted of the offence committed
under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.
Any amount deposited by the petitioner before the trial
Court is ordered to be released in favour of the respondent.
A sum of Rs.10,000/- lying before the trial Court is
ordered to be appropriate to the State towards cost.
Sd/-
JUDGE
NR/-
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!