Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9850 Kant
Judgement Date : 8 December, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:44686
MFA No. 5607 of 2018
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 5607 OF 2018 (MV-D)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. RANGAMMA,
W/O LATE NARAYANAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS,
RESIIDNG AT NO.22, GANAKALLU VILLAGE,
DEVAMACHOHALLI, BENGALURU URBAN.
2. KUM. BHAGYA,
D/O LATE NARAYANAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS,
SINCE MINOR,
REPRESENTED BY THEIR,
MOTHER AS A NATURAL GUARDIAN,
SMT. RANGAMMA,
RESIDING AT NO.22, GANAKALLU VILLAGE,
Digitally DEVAMACHOHALLI, BENGALURU URBAN.
signed by JAI
JYOTHI J
Location:
HIGH 3. KUM. GAYATHRI @ GAYANA,
COURT OF
KARNATAKA D/O LATE NARAYANAPPA,
AGED ABOUT 14 YEARS,
SINCE MINOR,
REPRESENTED BY THEIR,
MOTHER AS A NATURAL GUARDIAN,
SMT. RANGAMMA,
RESIDING AT NO.22, GANAKALLU VILLAGE,
DEVAMACHOHALLI, BENGALURU URBAN.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. NAIK N. R, ADVOCATE (ABSENT) )
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:44686
MFA No. 5607 of 2018
AND:
1. SRI. K. V. GIRISH,
S/O SRI K M VENKATESH,
NO.33 & 122 2ND CROSS,
EAST KASTURI NAGARA,
GAYATHRINAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 021
2. RELIIANCE GEN.INS. CO. LTD.,
REGIONAL OFFICE NO.28,
5TH FLOOR, CENTENARY BUILDING,
M G ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI.D. VIJAY KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 04.09.2017 PASSED IN MVC
NO.3986/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE XIII ADDITIONAL JUDGE,
COURT OF SMALL CAUSES AND MEMBER MACT, BENGALURU,
(SCCH-15), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR
COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF
COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
As there was no representation on behalf of the
appellants on 07.12.2023, this matter was directed to be
posted for dismissal on today. Today also, there is no
NC: 2023:KHC:44686
representation on behalf of the appellants. This is an
appeal of the year 2018, till now service of notice is not
complete as the appellants had not taken steps to serve
notice on the respondents. It appears the appellants is
not interested to pursue the matter.
2. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed for non-
prosecution.
SD/-
JUDGE
MEG
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!