Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9670 Kant
Judgement Date : 7 December, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC:44476
RFA No. 1009 of 2008
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 7TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE V SRISHANANDA
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.1009 OF 2008
BETWEEN:
1. LAKKAPPA
S/O NANJAPPA
SINCE DEAD BY LEGAL REPRESENTATIVES
1(a) SRI KRISHNAPPA
S/O LATE LAKKAPPA
AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
RESIDING AT NO.18/35, 3RD MAIN
MARENAHALLI,
VINAYAKA LAYOUT
VIJAYANAGARA,
BENGALURU - 560 040
1(b) SRI NARAYANAPPA
S/O LATE LAKKAPPA
Digitally AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS
signed by R R/O SHIVAKOTE VILLAGE AND POST
MANJUNATHA
HESARGHATTA HOBLI
Location:
HIGH COURT BANGALORE NORTH TALUK
OF BENGALURU - 560 089.
KARNATAKA
1(c) SMT.AMMAYAMMA
D/O LATE LAKKAPPA
W/O BEERAPPA
AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS
R/O 23RD WARD, DANDUPALYA
HOSKOTE TOWN -562 114
BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT.
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC:44476
RFA No. 1009 of 2008
1(d) KANTHAMMA
D/O LATE LAKKAPPA
W/O LATE HONNAPPA
AGEDA BOUT 44 YEARS
R/O MUNIMALLAPPA COMPOUND
ATTIGUPPE, VIJAYANAGAR
BENGALURU - 560 040.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI S NARENDRA, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. DODDAIAH
S/O NANJAPPA
SINCE DEAD BY HIS LRS
1(a) SMT.HONNAMMA
AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS
W/O LATE DODDAIAH
1(b) SMT. SIDDAGANGAMMA
AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS
D/O LATE DODDAIAH,
1(c) SMT. SHOBHA
AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
D/O LATE DODDAIAH,
1(d) SMT. SADASHIVAMMA
AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS
D/O LATE DODDAIAH,
1(e) SMT. ANITHA
AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS,
D/O LATE DODDAIAH,
RESPONDENTS NO.1(a) to 1(e) ARE
RESIDING AT NO.18/35, (OLD NO.16/4)
1ST MAIN, VINAYAKA LAYOUT,
MARENAHALLI
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC:44476
RFA No. 1009 of 2008
VIJAYANAGARA,
BANGALORE - 560 040
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI S.N.PRASHANTH CHANDRA, ADVOCATE)
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED U/S 96 R/W
ORDER 41 RULE 1 OF THE CIVIL PROCEDURE CODE AGAINST
THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 13.8.08 PASSED IN OS
NO.5434/91 ON THE FILE OF THE V ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE,
BANGALORE, DECREEING THE SUIT FOR SPECIFIC
PERFORMANCE.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL COMING ON FOR FINAL
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE
FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
Parties are present with their respective counsels. They
present a joint compromise petition under Order XXIII Rule 3
CPC. Contents of the joint memo read over to the parties,
parties have agreed that the contents of the joint memo depicts
the true terms of settlement and there is no force, undue
influence or coercion in reaching out the compromise terms. As
such, there is no impediment for this Court to accept the joint
memo and dispose of the appeal in terms of the joint memo.
2. Out of the compromise amount of Rs.60,75,000/-, today
Rs.30,75,000/- is handed over by way of demand draft.
Balance of Rs.30,00,000/- should be handed over on or before
30.01.2024.
NC: 2023:KHC:44476
3. The respondent acknowledge receipt of Rs.30,75,000/- by
way of two demand drafts by signing the ordersheet.
Accordingly, following order is passed:
ORDER
Appeal stands disposed of in terms of compromise
petition.
Office is directed to pass a modified decree in terms of
compromise petition appending the copy of the compromise
petition as part of the decree.
No order as to costs.
Relist this matter on 1st week of February, 2024 for
compliance.
Sd/-
JUDGE
MR
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!