Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 9052 Kant
Judgement Date : 1 December, 2023
-1-
NC: 2023:KHC-D:14040
RFA No. 100167 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE HANCHATE SANJEEVKUMAR
REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.100167/2017(PAR/POS)
BETWEEN:
1. SMT. NIRMALA
W/O. SADANAND JAMBAGI,
AGE: 68 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORKS,
R/AT: A/143/2,
OPPOSITE: JEEVAN BIMA NAGAR,
POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU- 560 075.
2. GIRISH
S/O. SADANAND JAMBAGI,
AGE: 36 YEARS,
OCC: ADVOCATE,
R/AT: A/143/2,
OPPOSITE: JEEVAN BIMA NAGAR,
POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU- 560 075.
Digitally signed
by
VIJAYALAKSHMI
VIJAYALAKSHMI M KANKUPPI
M KANKUPPI
Date:
2023.12.16
12:44:17 +0530
3. SMT. GEETHA
D/O. SADANAND JAMBAGI,
W/O. GIRISH HANGANDI,
AGE: 41 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORKS,
R/AT: A/143/2,
OPPOSITE: JEEVAN BIMA NAGAR,
POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU- 560 075.
4. SMT. SANGEETHA
D/O. SADANAND JAMBAGI,
W/O. AVINASH NAGARAJ,
AGE: 38 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORKS,
-2-
NC: 2023:KHC-D:14040
RFA No. 100167 of 2017
R/AT: A/143/2,
OPPOSITE: JEEVAN BIMA NAGAR,
POLICE STATION,
BENGALURU- 560 075.
...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI S. B. HEBBALLI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. APPANNA
S/O. GANAPATRAO JAMBAGI,
AGE: 58 YEARS,
OCC: BUSINESS,
R/AT: HOUSE NO. 9, WARD NO. 11,
EXTENSION AREA,
HOUSING COLONY,
BAGALKOT-587101.
2. SMT. LATA
W/O. BASAVARAJ JAMBAGI,
AGE: 53 YEARS,
OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORKS,
R/AT: C/O. S.M. MAVALLI,
SIDDHAROODH BUILDING,
2ND CROSS, JAYANAGARA,
DHARWAD- 580 001.
3. NITIN
S/O. BASAVARAJ JAMBAGI,
AGE: 33 YEARS,
OCC: PRIVATE SERVICE,
R/AT: C/O. S.M. MAVALLI,
SIDDHAROODH BUILDING,
2ND CROSS, JAYANAGARA,
DHARWAD-580001.
...RESPONDENTS
(APPEAL DISMISSED AGAINST R1;
APPEAL DISMISSED AGAINST R2 AND R3)
THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC 1908,
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
05.11.2016 PASSED IN O.S.NO.93/2014 ON THE FILE PRINCIPAL
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AT BAGALKOT AND ETC.,
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
-3-
NC: 2023:KHC-D:14040
RFA No. 100167 of 2017
ORDER
The appellants have not taken out hand summons so
as to serve notice on respondent No.2 and respondent
No.3. Therefore, appeal stands dismissed against the
respondent Nos.2 and 3.
Since, the appeal is abated against the respondent
No.1, therefore, appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/-
JUDGE
HMB
CT-ASC
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!