Friday, 08, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri Jagadish vs Sri Manjunath Gowda
2023 Latest Caselaw 10660 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10660 Kant
Judgement Date : 15 December, 2023

Karnataka High Court

Sri Jagadish vs Sri Manjunath Gowda on 15 December, 2023

                                           -1-
                                                        NC: 2023:KHC:45946
                                                      MFA No. 4984 of 2019




                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                       DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

                                         BEFORE
                     THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
                MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO.4984 OF 2019(MV-I)
                BETWEEN:

                      SRI. JAGADISH,
                      S/O LATE NARAYANAPPA
                      @ NAREPPA,
                      NOW AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS.

                      APERSON INCAPABLE OF
                      PROTECTING HIS INTEREST,
                      IS REPRESENTED BY HIS NEXT
                      FRIEND/WIFE,
                      SMT. SHAMALAMMA,
                      W/O JAGADISH,
                      AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS.


Digitally             BOTH ARE
signed by JAI         R/AT KEMBATHANAHALLI VILLAGE,
JYOTHI J
Location:             THOTLI POST,
HIGH COURT            KOLAR TALUK & DISTRICT.
OF
KARNATAKA                                                     ...APPELLANT
                (BY SRI. GOPAL KRISHNA N., ADVOCATE)

                AND:

                1.    SRI. MANJUNATH GOWDA,
                      S/O GANGAPPA,
                      MAJOR IN AGE,
                      R/AT NO.283,
                      AMBEDKAR NAGAR,
                             -2-
                                         NC: 2023:KHC:45946
                                      MFA No. 4984 of 2019




     1-9 ROAD, LEFT SIDE OF ULLALA,
     BANGALORE - 560 056.

2.   THE ORIENTAL INSURANCE
     COMPANY LTD.,
     BRANCH OFFICE,
     NO.20, 2ND FLOOR, 9TH MAIN,
     OPP: PAI VICEROY HOTEL,
     JAYANAGAR III BLOCK,
     BANGALORE - 560 011.
     REP. BY ITS MANAGER.
                                            ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ASHOK N NAYAK, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
    VIDE ORDER DATED:06.11.2023, NOTICE TO
    R1 IS DISPENSED WITH)

     THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 16/09/2017, PASSED IN MVC
NO.7467/2012, ON THE FILE OF THE XXII ADDITIONAL SMALL
CAUSES JUDGE & XX ACMM., & MEMBER, MACT, BENGALURU,
(SCCH-24), PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR
COMPENSATION      AND    SEEKING     ENHANCEMENT     OF
COMPENSATION.

     THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR FINAL HEARING, THIS
DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                        JUDGMENT

Aggrieved by the award passed in M.V.C.No.7467/2012

on the file of the XXII Additional Small Causes Judge and XX

Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate & MACT, Bengaluru

(SCCH-24) at Bengaluru dated 16.09.2017, the claimant is

before this Court seeking enhancement of compensation. The

claim petition is filed seeking compensation of amount of

NC: 2023:KHC:45946

Rs.20,00,000/- for the injuries sustained by the claimant in the

motor accident.

2. It is the case of the claimant that on 01.06.2012 at

about 9.00 a.m., the injured was going towards his village by

riding the motor cycle when he was about to enter Kolar - H.

Cross road, one Hero Honda Splendor Pro came from Vemgal

side ridden by its rider at high speed in a rash and negligent

manner went to the wrong side of the road and dashed against

the petitioner's motor cycle. Due to the impact, he was

knocked down and sustained injuries. According to the

claimant, he was earning an amount of Rs.9,000/- per month.

Because of the accident, he is bed ridden till date. As per the

wound certificate, the petitioner had sustained intra ventricular

bleed in B/L and lateral ventricle extending into III Ventricle,

Intraparenchymal bleed in left basal ganglionics and open type

III M/3 B/3 fracture right femur with intra articular extension of

lacerated wound over right knee with tibial tuberosity

unicortical fracture. As per the doctor, these injuries are

grievous in nature. It is stated by the doctor that the claimant

is always bed ridden. Inspite of best available treatment, he is

suffering from severe head ache and giddiness, all his sense

NC: 2023:KHC:45946

organs have become weak speech, vision and hearing capacity

has been greatly affected, due to head injury and femur

fracture all his four limbs have become weak and he cannot

move an inch independently. He is suffering from right sided

hemiperisis i.e., stroke to right side limbs and weakness.

Considering all these factors, the Court below had granted an

amount of 50,000/- under the head pain and sufferings. When

it comes to medical expenses, an amount of Rs.3,27,370/- is

awarded. Towards conveyance, food and nourishment,

Rs.50,000/- is awarded and towards present and future

attendant charges, an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- is awarded.

According to the doctor, claimant had sustained 83.33%

disability to the whole body. The Court below had considered

70% disability and granted an amount of Rs.7,05,600/- under

the head loss of present and future earnings and towards loss

of amenities of life, an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- is awarded. All

together, compensation of Rs.13,82,970/- was awarded.

3. Learned counsel appearing for the appellant/claimant

submits that the claimant had sustained 80% disability more or

less it is 100% disability. He is not in a position to do any work

on his own. It is the case of the claimant that he was working

NC: 2023:KHC:45946

as a Mason and earning a sum of Rs.9,000/- per month. The

Court below had taken income of the claimant at Rs.6,000/- per

month. Learned counsel submits that it is an accident of the

year 2012. The Court below ought to have taken Rs.7,000/- as

income. It is submitted that while awarding compensation

under the head loss of future income due to disability, the

Court below had not considered the future prospectus as he is

aged about 44 years. The Court below ought to have

considered future prospects at 25% which was not done. He

submits that no amounts were granted under the head loss of

income during laid up period. Further, under all the other

heads, the Court below has not awarded reasonable

compensation.

4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondent No.2 -

Insurance Company submits that the Court below had rightly

considered and in fact, the compensation awarded under all

heads by the Court below is on the higher side and no grounds

are made out for interference.

5. Having heard learned counsel on either side and

perused the entire material on record.

NC: 2023:KHC:45946

6. In this case, as per the medical evidence, the claimant

had sustained severe injuries to the head and other parts of the

body. For the injuries sustained to the head, he is not in a

position to do any work and his sensory organs have become

weak. The Court below had considered the disability at 70%.

This Court finds that disability arrived at 70% requires no

interference from this Court and coming to the income,

according to the claimant he was earning Rs.9,000/- per

month. The Court had taken income of the claimant at

Rs.6,000/- per month. Considering the year of accident i.e.,

2012 and as per the chart, this Court is inclined to take notional

income of the claimant at Rs.7,000/-. Considering the age of

the claimant at 44 years, future prospects of 25% has to be

added to the income. Hence, compensation under the head

loss of future income due to disability comes to Rs.8,750 x

12 x 14 x 70/100 = 10,29,000/-. Towards pain and

sufferings, the Court below had granted an amount of

Rs.50,000/-, considering the head injury, this Court is inclined

to grant an amount of Rs.90,000/- towards pain and

sufferings. Coming to the medical expenses, the Tribunal

had rightly granted an amount of Rs.3,27,370/- basing on the

NC: 2023:KHC:45946

evidence let in and on that count, no interference is called for.

Coming to attendant, conveyance, food and nourishment,

the Tribunal had rightly granted an amount of Rs.50,000/-

and no interference is called for. Towards present and future

attendant charges, the Court below had granted an amount of

Rs.1,00,000/-, considering the injuries sustained by the

claimant, this Court is inclined to grant an amount of

Rs.1,50,000/- towards present and future attendant

charges. Towards future medical expenses, the Court below

had granted an amount of Rs.50,000/-, considering the injuries

this Court is inclined to grant an amount of Rs.1,00,000/-

towards future medical expenses. Towards loss of amenities

of life, the Court below had granted an amount of

Rs.1,00,000/-, considering the disability at 70% to the whole

body and evidence on record, this Court is inclined to grant an

amount of Rs.1,20,000/- towards loss of amenities of life.

The Court below had not granted any compensation towards

loss of income during laid up period. This Court is inclined to

grant an amount of Rs.42,000/- (7,000 x 6) towards loss of

income during laid up period.

NC: 2023:KHC:45946

7. In the light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court in the case of V.MEKALA VS.M.MALATHI AND

ANOTHER1, the claimant is entitled for an amount of

Rs.10,000/- towards legal expenses.

8. The claimant is entitled for compensation under the

following heads:

     Sl.No.             Description of Items                 Amounts

                                                                  Rs.

     1.        Pain and Suffering                                 90,000.00

     2.        Medical expenses                                3,27,370.00

     3.        Loss of future income due to                   10,29,000.00
               disability

     4.        Attendant, conveyance,           food              50,000.00
               and nourishment

     5.        Future medical expenses                         1,00,000.00

     6.        Loss of amenities                               1,20,000.00

     7.        Loss of income during laid up                      42,000.00
               period

     8.        Present and future attendant                        1,50,000
               charges

     9.        Legal Expenses                                     10,000.00

               Total                                         19,18,370.00




    (2014) 11 SCC 178

                                              NC: 2023:KHC:45946





(a) Accordingly, the appeal is Allowed-in-part, enhancing the compensation amount from Rs.13,82,970/- to Rs.19,18,370/-.

(b) The enhanced amount shall carry interest @ 6% per annum from the date of petition, till the date of realization.

(c) Respondent No.2 - Insurance Company shall deposit the enhanced compensation amount within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of the judgment. On such deposit, the claimant is entitled to withdraw the same without furnishing the security.

(d) The claimant is not entitled for interest for the delayed period of 536 days in filing the appeal.

(e) No Costs.

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand

closed.

SD/-

JUDGE

MH/-

CT:SNN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter