Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. Narayanappa vs The State Of Karnataka
2023 Latest Caselaw 10404 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10404 Kant
Judgement Date : 13 December, 2023

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Narayanappa vs The State Of Karnataka on 13 December, 2023

                                                  -1-
                                                            NC: 2023:KHC:45254
                                                         WP No. 26592 of 2023




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                             DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

                                                BEFORE
                               THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH
                             WRIT PETITION NO.26592 OF 2023 (KLR-RES)
                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    SRI. NARAYANAPPA
                            S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA
                            AGED ABOUT 72 YEARS

                      2.    SRI. MUDDAPPA
                            S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA
                            AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS

                      3.    SRI. THIMMARAYAPPA
                            S/O LATE MUNIYAPPA
                            AGED ABOUT 63 YEARS

                            ALL ARE RESIDING AT
                            PUTTAPPA TEMPLE STREET
                            WARD NO.19, DEVANAHALLI TOWN,
                            DEVANAHALLI TALUK,
                            BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT 562 110.
Digitally signed by
ARUN KUMAR M S                                                  ...PETITIONERS
Location: High
Court of Karnataka    (BY SRI. CHANDRASHEKAR SWAMY K.B., ADVOCATE)

                      AND:

                      1.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                            BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY,
                            DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE,
                            VIDHANA SOUDHA,
                            VIDHANA VEEDHI,
                            BANGALORE - 560001.

                      2.    THE TAHASILDAR
                            DEVANAHALLI TALUK
                             -2-
                                       NC: 2023:KHC:45254
                                     WP No. 26592 of 2023




     DEVANAHALLI
     BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.

3.   THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER
     DODDABALLAPURA SUB-DIVISION
     DODDABALLAPURA
     BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203.

4.   THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER
     BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT
     DISTRICT COMPLEX
     BEERASANDRA VILLAGE
     KUNDANA HOBLI
     DEVANAHALLI TALUK
     BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.

     MUNIYAMMA
     SINCE DEAD REPRESENTED BY LRS

5.   SRI. MUNIYAPPA
     S/O LATE PUTTEERAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 64 YEARS
     R/AT FORT
     DEVENAHALLI TOWN
     DEVANAHALLI TALUK
     BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.

     PUTTEERAPPA
     SINCE DECEASED REP. BY LRS.

6.   SMT. GANGADHARAMMA @ GANGADRI
     W/O LATE PUTTEERAPPA @
     POLICE PUTTEERAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

7.   AVISH @ HAVYAS
     S/O LATE PUTTEERAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS

8.   ASHA @ HASINI
     D/O LATE PUTTEERAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 17 YEARS
                           -3-
                                      NC: 2023:KHC:45254
                                   WP No. 26592 of 2023




     RESPONDENTS NO.7 AND 8
     ARE MINORS REPRESENTED
     BY THEIR NATURAL MOTHER
     AND GUARDIAN
     SMT. GANGADHARAMMA ALIAS GANGADRI

     RESPONDENTS NO.6 TO 8 ARE
     R/AT NAYAKARA BEEDHI,
     7TH WARD KOTE ROAD
     DEVANAHALLI TOWN
     DEVANAHALLI TALUK
     BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.

9.   SMT. ERAMMA
     D/O LATE PUTTEERAPPA
     AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS
     R/AT MAHAMADAPURA VILLAGE
     AMBAJIDURGA HOBLI
     CHAANDRAHALLI POST
     CHINTAMANI TALUK
     CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 563 125.

10. SMT. AKKAYYAMMA
    D/O LATE PUTTEERAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS
    R/AT MELUR VILLAGE AND POST
    JANGAMAKOTE HOBLI
    SIDLAGHATTA TALUK
    CHIKKABALLAPURA DISTRICT - 562102.

     NARAYANA
     SINCE DECEASED REP. BY LRS.

11. MUNIYAMMA
    W/O LATE NARAYANA
    AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS

12. KUMARI NANDHINI
    D/O LATE NARAYANA
    AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS
                            -4-
                                     NC: 2023:KHC:45254
                                  WP No. 26592 of 2023




13. KUMARI ARUNA
    D/O LATE NARAYANA
    AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS

14. KUMARI PUSHPA
    D/O LATE NARAYANA
    AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS

    RESPONDENTS NO. 11 TO 14 ARE
    RESIDING AT
    NAYAKARA BEEDHI 7TH WARD
    KOTE ROAD, DEVANAHALLI TOWN
    DEVANAHALLI TALUK
    BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562 110.

15. SRI. KRISHNA
    S/O LATE PUTTEERAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

16. SRI. NAGA
    S/O LATE PUTTEERAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS

17. SRI. ANIL
    S/O LATE PUTTEERAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS

18. SRI. BHADRA
    S/O LATE PUTTEERAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS.

    RESPONDENTS NO.15 TO 18
    ARE R/AT FORT
    DEVANAHALLI TOWN
    DEVANAHALLI TALUK
    BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT-562 110.

19. SMT. AKKAYYAMMA @ KULLI
    D/O LATE PUTTEERAPPA
    W/O AVALAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS
    R/AT BOMMANAHALLI VILLAGE
                            -5-
                                       NC: 2023:KHC:45254
                                    WP No. 26592 of 2023




    KASABA HOBLI
    DEVANAHALLI TALUK
    BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT.

20. SMT. LATHA
    D/O LATE PUTTEERAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS
    RESIDING AT FORT
    DEVENAHALLI TOWN
    DEVANAHALLI TALUK
    BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562110.

21. SMT. LAKSHMI
    D/O LATE PUTTEERAPPA
    AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS
    R/AT DHARMARAYASWAMY
    TEMPLE ROAD
    DEVANAHALLI TOWN
    DEVANAHALLI TALUK
    BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562110.

22. SRI. D.B. MUNIYAPPA
    S/O LATE BHADRAIAH
    AGED ABOUT 78 YEARS
    RESIDING AT FORT
    DEVENAHALLI TOWN
    DEVANAHALLI TALUK
    BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 562110.
                                           ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. HARISHA A.S., AGA FOR R1 TO R4)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226
AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO
QUASH THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 15/09/2023 PASSED IN
THE REVISION PETITION IN R.P. NO.110/2018, PASSED BY
THE RESPONDENT NO.4 - THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER,
BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT VIDE IN R.P. NO.110/2018 VIDE
ANNEXURE-O.
                            -6-
                                       NC: 2023:KHC:45254
                                   WP No. 26592 of 2023




     THIS    PETITION,   COMING   ON   FOR   PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                          ORDER

Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts

notice for respondents 1 to 4.

2. In this writ petition, the petitioners are

assailing order dated 15.09.2023 passed in Revision

Petition No.110 of 2018 by the respondent No.4

(Annexure-O).

3. I have heard Sri Chandrashekarswamy K.B.,

learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and Sri

Harisha A.S., learned Additional Government Advocate

appearing for the respondent-State and perused the

finding recorded by the respondent No.4.

4. Perusal of the writ petition would indicate

that, the contesting respondents herein have filed OS

No.190 of 1992 before the Additional Civil Judge

(Jr.Dn) JMFC at Devanahalli and the said suit was

NC: 2023:KHC:45254

decreed in part on 17.10.2006 and judgment and

decree passed by the Trial Court was confirmed in RA

No.1 of 2007 dated 27.05.2010 (Annexure-G) and by

this court in RSA No.2326 of 2010 (Annexure-H).

Feeling aggrieved by the judgment passed by this

Court, SLP (Civil) No.33638 of 2018 (Annexure- J)

was filed before the Hon'ble Supreme Court and the

Hon'ble Supreme Court confirmed the judgment and

decree passed in OS No.190 of 1992. Perusal of the

averments made in the writ petition would indicate

that, the petitioner had filed OS No.303 of 2009

before the Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Devanahalli

for temporary injunction. In that view of the matter,

taking into consideration the fact that, the rights of

the parties have already been crystallized in OS No.

190 of 1992 and was confirmed by the Hon'ble

Supreme Court as mentioned above and I am of the

view that, respondents 3 and 4 were justified in

NC: 2023:KHC:45254

rejecting the petition filed by the petitioner, seeking

change of khata in respect of the subject land. In that

view of the matter, I do not find merit in the writ

petition and accordingly, the writ petition is

dismissed.

SD/-

JUDGE

SB

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter