Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri. Prakash Reddy H S vs The Secretary
2023 Latest Caselaw 10256 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 10256 Kant
Judgement Date : 12 December, 2023

Karnataka High Court

Sri. Prakash Reddy H S vs The Secretary on 12 December, 2023

Author: S.R.Krishna Kumar

Bench: S.R.Krishna Kumar

                                         -1-
                                                    NC: 2023:KHC:45222
                                                  RFA No. 2147 of 2023




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                   DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2023

                                     BEFORE
                   THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.R.KRISHNA KUMAR
                   REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO.2147 OF 2023 (DEC)
            BETWEEN:
            SRI. PRAKASH REDDY H S
            SREEBALAJI REDDY H.S (NEW NAME)
            S/O SOMASHEKAR REDDY,
            AGED ABOUT 41 YEARS,
            RESIDING AT NO. 94, 2ND CROSS ROAD,
            NANJAMMA LAYOUT, BENGALURU NORTH,
            BENGALURU-560 032.
                                                          ...APPELLANT
            (BY SRI. MANOJ S N.,ADVOCATE)
            AND:

            1.   THE SECRETARY
                 EDUCATION DEPARTMENT,
                 GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
                 VIDHANA SOUDHA,
                 BENGALURU.
Digitally
signed by   2.   THE HEAD MISTRESS
VANDANA S        R.K. INDIAN SCHOOL
Location:        (INDIA PUBLIC SCHOOL)
HIGH             KANAKANAGARA,
COURT OF         R.T. NAGAR POST,
KARNATAKA
                 BENGALURU-560 032.

            3.   THE BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER
                 BENGALURU NORTH,
                 NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
                 BENGALURU.

            4.   THE SECRETARY
                 KARNATAKA SECONDARY EDUCATION,
                 EXAMINATION BOARD,
                 BENGALURU-560 003.
                             -2-
                                         NC: 2023:KHC:45222
                                       RFA No. 2147 of 2023




5.   THE COMMISSIONER
     UNIQUE IDENTIFICATION AUTHORITY OF INDIA,
     P.O BOX NO. 1947
     KHANIJA BHAVAN BUILDING,
     RACE COURSE ROAD
     BENGALURU RURAL -560 001.

6.   THE COMMISSIONER
     ELECTION COMMISSIONER OF INDIA,
     SHESHADRI ROAD,
     BENGALURU--560 001.

7.   THE COMMISSIONER
     PAN CARD DEPARTMENT,
     NO.6, CAMBRIDGE ROAD,
     POLICE STATION ROAD,
     UDANT LAYOUT, HALASURU,
     KARNATAKA-560 008.

8.   THE ROAD TRANSPORT COMMISSIONER
     1ST FLOOR, A BLOCK,
     TTMC BUILDING, SHANTHINAGAR,
     BENGALURU-560 027.

9.   THE CHIEF REGISTRAR BIRTHS AND DEATHS
     1ST FLOOR, VISHVESHWARAYA TOWER,
     DR. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
     BENGALURU-560 001.
                                            ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. MAHANTESH SHETTAR, AGA FOR R-1, R-3, R-4, R-8 & R-9
    SRI. M.N. KUMAR, CGC., ADVOCATE FOR R-5 & R-7
    SRI. SHARASS CHANDRA DODWAD, ADVOCVATE FOR R-6
    NOTICE TO R-2 IS DISPENSED WITH
    VIDE ORDER DATED: 28.11.2023)

     THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST
THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 05.09.2023 PASSED IN
OS.NO.474/2023 ON THE FILE OF THE XVII ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL
AND SESSIONS JUDGE BENGALURU CITY, DISMISSING THE SUIT
FOR DECLARATION.

    THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
                                   -3-
                                                NC: 2023:KHC:45222
                                             RFA No. 2147 of 2023




                             JUDGMENT

This appeal is directed against the impugned judgment and

decree dated 05.09.2023 passed in O.S.No.474/2023 by the 17th

Addl. City Civil & Sessions Judge (CCH-16), Bengaluru, whereby

the said suit filed by the appellant - plaintiff for declaration of his

name as 'Sri. Balaji Reddy S' in place of 'Prakash Reddy H.S' and

for consequential mandatory injunction directing the respondents -

defendants to enter the name of the plaintiff as 'Sri. Balaji Reddy S'

in all school records, educational records and other registers,

records of the respondents - defendants was dismissed by the

Trial Court.

2. Heard learned counsel for the appellant and learned

counsel for the respondents and perused the material on record.

3. The material on record discloses that the appellant -

plaintiff instituted the aforesaid suit for declaration and mandatory

injunction interalia contending that his original name was 'Prakash

Reddy H.S' and the same was entered in all his records at school,

colleges, University, Government authorities, etc., Subsequently,

on the advise of astrologers and for other bonafide reasons, he

NC: 2023:KHC:45222

changed his name to 'Sri. Balaji Reddy S' and in this regard he

swore to an affidavit on 02.11.2020 followed by Newspaper

publication in 'Hosadignatha' and pursuant thereto he approached

the respondents seeking change of his name and entering his

name viz., 'Sri. Balaji Reddy S' in the records and since his

requests were not complied with by the respondents, he instituted

the aforesaid suit before the Trial Court.

4. In the suit, the defendants did not file their written

statement nor contested the suit. The plaintiff examined himself as

PW1 and exhibits P1 to P23 were marked while defendants did not

adduce any oral evidence or documentary evidence, pursuant to

which, the trial Court proceeded to pass the impugned judgment

and decree dismissing the suit, aggrieved by which, the appellant -

plaintiff is before this Court by way of the present appeal.

5. A perusal of the material on record including the

impugned judgment and decree will clearly indicate that the Trial

Court failed to consider and appreciate the unimpeached,

uncontroverted and unchallenged material on record produced by

the appellant - plaintiff including his pleadings and oral evidence as

NC: 2023:KHC:45222

PW1 and documentary evidence at exhibits P1 to P23, which

clearly established that while his original name was 'Prakash

Reddy H.S', subsequently, on the advise of astrologers and for

other bonafide reasons, he changed his name to 'Sri. Balaji Reddy

S' on 02.11.2020, he took all necessary steps to get his name

changed to 'Sri. Balaji Reddy S' by swearing to an affidavit, issuing

Newspaper publication, etc., as borne out from the material on

record. Under these circumstances, I am of the considered opinion

that the Trial Court completely misdirected itself in dismissing the

suit by assigning wholly untenable reasons, which are contrary to

the material on record and consequently, the impugned judgment

and decree passed by the Trial Court deserve to be set aside and

the suit filed by the appellant - plaintiff deserves to be decreed in

his favour.

6. In the result, I pass the following:

ORDER

(i) Appeal is hereby allowed.

(ii) The impugned judgment and decree dated

05.09.2023 passed in O.S.No.474/2023 by the 17th Addl. City

NC: 2023:KHC:45222

Civil & Sessions Judge (CCH-16), Bengaluru, is hereby set

aside

(iii) The suit of the appellant - plaintiff is decreed as

sought for by him.

(iv) Registry is directed to draw decree accordingly.

Sd/-

JUDGE

DHA / SV

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter