Sunday, 19, Apr, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Director vs The Secretary
2023 Latest Caselaw 6159 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 6159 Kant
Judgement Date : 30 August, 2023

Karnataka High Court
The Director vs The Secretary on 30 August, 2023
Bench: N S Gowda
                                        -1-
                                                    NC: 2023:KHC:31087
                                                WP No. 6072 of 2012




                 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU

                    DATED THIS THE 30TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023

                                     BEFORE
                   THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE N S SANJAY GOWDA
                    WRIT PETITION NO. 6072 OF 2012 (S-RES)
            BETWEEN:

            1.    THE DIRECTOR
                  VOCATIONAL EDUCATION DEPT.
                  PRE-UNIVERSITY EDUCATION,
                  DEPT. BUILDING, 3RD FLOOR,
                  18TH CROSS, SAMPIGE ROAD,
                  MALLESHWARAM, BANGALORE.

            2.    THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
                  REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL
                  SECRETARY
                  TO GOVT.,
                  DEPT., OF EDUCATION PRIMARY AND
                  SECONDARY, M S BUILDING,
                  BANGALORE 560 001
Digitally                                               ...PETITIONERS
signed by
PANKAJA S   (BY SMT.PRATHIBHA.R.K., AGA)
Location:
HIGH
COURT OF    AND:
KARNATAKA

            1.    THE SECRETARY
                  KARNATAKA STATE VOCATIONAL
                  EDUCATION DEPARTMENT
                  SC/ST EMPLOYEES
                  WELFARE ASSOCIATION (R)
                  MANDYA.

            2.    SRI N ASHWATHAIAH,
                  MAJOR,
                  PART-TIME LECTURER, GOVT.,
                                         -2-
                                                            NC: 2023:KHC:31087
                                                         WP No. 6072 of 2012




     PRE-UNIVERSITY COLLEGE,
     DODDABALLAPUR.

3.   THE COMMISSIONER
     KARNATAKA STATE SCHEDULED CASTES
     AND SCHEDULE TRIBE COMMISSION,
     NO.14/3, 2ND FLOOR, CFC BLDG.,
     NRUPATHUNGA ROAD,
     BANGALORE 560 001.
                                        ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. R SOMASUNDARA, ADVOCATE FOR R-1;
    SRI. V.R.SARATHY, ADVOCATE FOR R-3;
    R-2 SERVED)

     THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND
227 OF THE CONSTITUTION O INDIA, PRAYING TO CALL FOR
THE RECORDS IN CASE NO.46 OF 2009 ON THE FILE OF THE
KARNATAKA STATE COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED CASTES
AND SCHEDULED TRIBES, BANGALORE AS PER ANNEXURE A,
ETC.

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                                     ORDER

1. The State Government has preferred this writ petition

challenging the order passed by the Karnataka State Scheduled

Castes and Scheduled Tribes Commission on 11.06.2010, which

reads as follows:

"1) ªÀÈwÛ ²PÀët E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ°è ºÁ° ¨ÁåPï¯ÁUï ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼ÉAzÀÄ UÀÄgÀÄw¹gÀĪÀ 28 ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ½UÉ FUÁUÀ¯Éà E¯ÁSÉAiÀİè PÉ®¸À ¤ªÀð»¸ÀÄwÛgÄÀ ªÀ ¥Àj²µÀÖ eÁw/¥Àj²µÀÖ ¥ÀAUÀqÀzÀ ¹§âA¢UÀ¼À£ÄÀ ß eÉõÀ×vÉAiÀÄ DzsÁgÀzÀ ªÉÄÃ¯É ¥ÀjUÀt¹ SÁAiÀÄAUÉÆ½¸À®Ä ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ. ºÁUÀÆ SÁAiÀÄAUÉÆ½¸ÀĪÁUÀ 162 SÁAiÀÄA

NC: 2023:KHC:31087 WP No. 6072 of 2012

ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À ¥ÀnÖAiÀİè gÉÆÃ¸ÀÖgï ©AzÀÄUÀ½UÉ C£ÀÄUÀÄtªÁV ¥Àj²µÀÖ eÁw/ ¥Àj²µÀÖ ªÀUÀðUÀ¼À ¹§âA¢üAiÀÄ£ÀÄß SÁAiÀÄA ªÀiÁqÀvÀPÌÀ zÄÀ Ý, SÁAiÀÄAUÉÆ½¸ÀĪÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß MAzÀÄ wAUÀ¼À M¼ÀUÁV ¥ÀÆtðUÉÆ½¸À®Ä ¸ÀÆa¹zÉ.

2) E¯ÁSÉAiÀÄ°è ¹§âA¢UÀ¼À£ÄÀ ß ªÀÈwÛ ²PÀët E¯ÁSÉAiÀİè FUÀ «±ÉõÀ ¤AiÀĪÀÄUÀ¼À£ÀÄß gÀZÀ£ÉªiÀ Ár, F E¯ÁSÉAiÀİè PÁAiÀÄ𠤪Àð»¸ÀÄwÛgÄÀ ªÀ J¯Áè ¹§âA¢AiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¸ÁªÀðd¤PÀ ²PÀët E¯ÁSÉ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ EvÀgÉ E¯ÁSÉUÀ¼À°è ¸ÀܼÀ ¤AiÀÄÄQÛUÉÆ½¸ÀĪÀ ªÀÄÄ£Àß 28 ¨ÁåPï¯ÁUï ºÀÄzÉÝUÀ¼À£ÄÀ ß ªÉÄîÌAqÀAvÉ vÀÄA§ÄªÀ ¥ÀæQæAiÉÄAiÀÄ£ÀÄß ¥ÀÆtðUÉÆ½¸À®Ä ¸ÀÆa¹ DzÉò¹zÉ."

2. It is clear from the above order that the Commission has

issued a direction to regularize the services of the employees

who were already working, on the basis of the seniority.

3. This Court in W.P.No.63405/2016 and

W.P.No.36193/2016 after placing reliance on the judgment of

the Apex Court in the cases of ALL INDIA INDIAN OVERSEAS

BANK SC AND ST EMPLOYEES' WELFARE ASSOCIATION &

OTHERS Vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS - (1996) 6 SCC

606 and COLLECTOR Vs. AJIT JOGI - (2011) 10 SCC 357 has

categorically declared that the State Commission would not

have the power to decide the dispute between the employees

and give a direction to the State Government to pass orders

which affects the conditions of service of an employee.

NC: 2023:KHC:31087 WP No. 6072 of 2012

4. In view of the aforesaid decisions, it is obvious that the

impugned order is one without jurisdiction. The impugned order

is, therefore, set aside and the writ petition is accordingly

allowed.

5. However, liberty is reserved to the 2nd respondent to

invoke appropriate proceedings seeking for regularization, if he

is so advised.

Sd/-

JUDGE

PKS

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IDRC

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter