Thursday, 07, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Sri.Veerupaxagouda vs Smt.Lakshmi
2023 Latest Caselaw 5507 Kant

Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 5507 Kant
Judgement Date : 10 August, 2023

Karnataka High Court
Sri.Veerupaxagouda vs Smt.Lakshmi on 10 August, 2023
Bench: J.M.Khazipresided Byjmkj
                                                 -1-
                                                        NC: 2023:KHC-D:8756
                                                       CRL.RP No. 100255 of 2016




                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

                              DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST, 2023

                                              BEFORE

                                 THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE J.M.KHAZI

                           CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO. 100255 OF 2016

                      BETWEEN:

                      1.    SRI. VEERUPAXAGOUDA
                            S/O. BASANGOUDA PATIL,
                            AGE: 61 YEARS,
                            OCC: SERVICE AND AGRICULTURE,
                            R/O: MYSORE CITY CHAMARAJ MOHALLA,
                            BOGADI BADAVANE, 1ST STAGE 6TH PHASE
                            SHARADA DEVI NAGAR,
                            LIG-2 MODEL, HOUSE NO.844, MYSORE.

                      2.  SMT. PARVATI G. BIDARI,
                          AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD WORK,
                          CHAMARAJ MOHALLA, BOGADI BADAVANE,
                          1ST STAGE 6TH PHASE, SHARADA DEVI NAGAR,
                          LIG-2 MODEL, HOUSE NO.844, MYSORE.
CHANDRASHEKAR
LAXMAN                                                         ...PETITIONERS
KATTIMANI             (BY SRI. N.P. VIVEKMEHTA, ADVOCATE)

                      AND:
Digitally signed by
CHANDRASHEKAR
LAXMAN                SMT. LAKSHMI
KATTIMANI             KOM VEERUPAKXAGOUDA PATIL,
Date: 2023.08.11
16:00:21 -0700        AGE: 55 YEARS,OCC: HOUSEHOLD,
                      SHEELAVANT-SOMAPUR VILLAGE,
                      TQ: SHIGGAON, DIST: HAVERI.
                                                                 ...RESPONDENT
                      (BY SRI. C.M. HEREKUNI, ADVOCATE FOR
                          SRI. SUNIL S. DESAI, ADVOCATE)

                           THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER
                      SECTION 397 (1) R/W SEC. 401 OF CR.P.C., SEEKING TO SET
                      ASIDE THE ORDER OF THE I ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSION
                                 -2-
                                           NC: 2023:KHC-D:8756
                                          CRL.RP No. 100255 of 2016




JUDGE HAVERI, DT. 30/08/16 DISMISSING THE CR.APPEAL
NO. 86/15 AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT & ORDER OF
COURT OF THE CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC SHIGGAON DT. 18/9/2015
PASSED IN C.C.NO. 257/2009.

     THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:

                            ORDER

This criminal revision petition is filed challenging the

conviction and sentence of petitioners/accused for the

offence punishable under Sections 494 of IPC and the same

is confirmed by the Sessions Court in criminal appeal

No.86/2015. Now the parties have settled the matter

between them and they have filed joint memo before Lok-

Adalath dated 12.11.2022, agreeing among other things to

withdraw the criminal case filed against the

petitioners/accused and filed a joint petition seeking

divorce. Accordingly, they have filed joint petition seeking

decree of divorce in M.C.No.75/2022. Since the offences for

which the petitioners/accused are convicted i.e punishable

under section 494 IPC is compoundable only with the

permission of the Court, now they have filed compromise

NC: 2023:KHC-D:8756 CRL.RP No. 100255 of 2016

petition under Section 320 of Cr.P.C. to grant permission to

compound the offences and acquit the petitioners/accused.

2. It is submitted that as per the compromise

entered into between the parties, the petitioner No.1 has

deposited sum of Rs.5,00,000/- as permanent alimony

before M.C.No.75/2022 before Senior Civil Judge, JMFC

Shiggaov and same has been withdrawn by the

respondent.

3. In the light of compromise entered into

between the parties, permission is granted to compound

the offence under Section 494 of IPC.

4. The impugned judgment and order of the trial

Court and Sessions Court is set-aside. The

petitioners/accused are acquitted for the offences

punishable under Section 494 of IPC. Their bail bond stands

discharged. Accordingly, the petition is allowed.

Sd/-

JUDGE

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter