Citation : 2023 Latest Caselaw 2304 Kant
Judgement Date : 20 April, 2023
-1-
CRL.A No. 61 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF APRIL, 2023
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE MOHAMMAD NAWAZ
CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 61 OF 2023
BETWEEN:
1. SRI.KIRAN,
S/O. NAGARAJU,
AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS,
R/AT NO. DODDAMUDAVADI VILLAGE,
HAROHALLI HOBLI,
KANAKAPURA TALUK,
RAMANGARA -562 159.
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. H.V.HARISH,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. STATE BY KARNATAKA,
Digitally signed by REPRESENTED BY
LAKSHMINARAYAN
N KANAKAPURA RURAL
Location: High
Court of Karnataka POLICE STATION,
RAMANGAR DISTRICT,
NOW REPRESENTED BY ITS
PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,
HIGH COURT COMPLEX,
BANGALORE- 560 001.
2. SMT. LAKSHMAMMA,
W/O. LATE GOPALA,
AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS,
-2-
CRL.A No. 61 of 2023
RESIDING AT
GUGAREDODDI VILLAGE,
HAROHALLI VILLAGE,
KANAKAPURA TALUK,
RAMANGARA - 562 159.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. K.NAGESHWARAPPA, HCGP FOR R1/STATE;
R2 SERVED, UN REPRESENTED)
THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.14(A) (2) OF SC/ST (POA)
ACT, 2015 PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED
17.12.2022 PASSED BY THE I ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND
SESSIONS JUDGE, RAMANAGARA IN CRL.MISC.NO.1113/2022.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY,
THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT
The appeal is preferred against the order dated
17.12.2022 passed by the Court of the I Additional District
and Sessions Judge, Ramanagara, in
Crl.Misc.No.1113/2022, whereby the learned Sessions
Judge has dismissed the petition filed under Section.439 of
Cr.P.C.
CRL.A No. 61 of 2023
2. The Accused/appellant has been charge sheeted
for offences punishable under Sections 363 and 376 of
IPC, Sections 4, 8, 12, 16 and 17 of the POCSO Act 2012
and Section 3(2)(v) of the Scheduled Castes/Scheduled
Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act 2015.
3. Respondent no.2/defacto complainant has been
served but there is no representation.
4. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the
appellant is a young boy aged 22 years and since
01.08.2022, he is in judicial custody. He submits, inspite
of filing of Charge sheet evidence of the victim is not yet
recorded. He further submits that he may be permitted to
file a fresh petition seeking bail before the Sessions Court
and therefore, seeks to withdrawn the appeal.
5. Considering that the charge sheet is already filed
and the appellant is in custody from 01.08.2022, the
learned Sessions Judge/Special Judge is directed to record
the evidence of the victim girl expeditiously keeping in
view the relevant provisions of the POCSO Act 2012.
CRL.A No. 61 of 2023
6. The appellant is permitted to file a fresh petition
before the Sessions Court, once the evidence of the victim
girl is recorded.
With the observation, appeal is disposed of.
Sd/-
JUDGE
AVB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!