Wednesday, 13, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Dilshad D/O Ismail vs Maruti S/O Hanumesh Rao Maratha
2022 Latest Caselaw 12123 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12123 Kant
Judgement Date : 23 September, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Dilshad D/O Ismail vs Maruti S/O Hanumesh Rao Maratha on 23 September, 2022
Bench: H.P.Sandesh
                              -1-




                                     MFA No. 100460 of 2015




     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD
                           BENCH

     DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2022

                           BEFORE
        THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.P.SANDESH
     MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 100460 OF
                        2015 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:

1.    DILSHAD D/O ISMAIL
      AGE: 13 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,
      SINCE MINOR R/BY HER FATHER
      ISMAIL S/O ABDUL ZALEEL
      AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: DRIVER,
      R/O. KORRAMMA CAMP,
      TQ: GANGAVATHI, DIST: KOPPAL

                                                    ...APPELLANT

(BY SRI. M AMARE GOUDA, ADVOCATE)

AND:

1.    MARUTI S/O HANUMESH RAO MARATHA
      AGE: 31 YEARS,
      OCC: DRIVER OF TATA SUMO
      VEHICLE BEARING NO.KA-37/M-1652, R/O. KARATAGI,
      GANGAVATHI, DIST: KOPPAL

2.    Y SRINIVAS S/O LAXMIDAS
      AGE: 38 YEARS,
      OCC: BUSINESS and OWNER OF
      TATA SUMO VEHICLE BEARING NO.KA-37/M-1652,
      R/O. CHELLUR CAMP, GANGAVATHI, DIST: KOPPAL
                                      -2-




                                             MFA No. 100460 of 2015

3.    THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER
      DIVISIONAL OFFICER, UNITED
      INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD.,
      GANDHI CHOUK, RAICHUR

                                                        ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRASHANT S KADADEVAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 & R2,
SRI.N.R.KUPPELUR, ADVOCATE FOR R3)


       THIS   APPEAL    IS   FILED    U/SEC.173(1)     OF   THE   MOTOR
VEHICLES      ACT,   1988,   AGAINST       THE   JUDGMENT    &    AWARD
DATED:03.09.2012, PASSED IN MVC.NO.206/2009, ON THE FILE OF
THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & MEMBER, MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS
TRIBUNAL, GANGAVATHI, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIMS PETITION
FOR     COMPENSATION          &      SEEKING      ENHANCEMENT        OF
COMPENSATION.

     THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE
COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


                             JUDGMENT

Though this appeal is listed for admission today, with

the consent of both the parties, it is taken up for final

disposal.

2. The claimant aged about 7 years met with an

accident and he has suffered fracture of tibia and also

patella and doctor assessed disability at 20% to whole

body in the chief examination, but in the cross-

MFA No. 100460 of 2015

examination, he admits that it comes to 10% to whole

body.

3. Having taken note of the nature of injuries and

mal union of tibia and when the doctor has assessed the

disability at 10%, this Court has to take note of the

judgement of the Apex Court in the case of Master

Mallikarjun vs. Divisional Manager, The National

Insurance Company Limited and Another reported in

AIR 2014 SC 736, wherein it is held that in a case of

disability at 10%, the Court has to award Rs.1,00,000/-

and hence, Rs.1,00,000/- is awarded in the present case

also.

4. The injured was also in hospital for 10 days and

parents might have lost their income and apart from that

food and incidental expenses, it is appropriate to award

Rs.25,000/- on loss of income of the parents and other

incidental expenses.

MFA No. 100460 of 2015

5. The Tribunal awarded an amount of Rs.3,000/-

towards medical expenses and no bills are produced

before the Court and hence, it is appropriate to award in

total Rs.10,000/- on medical expenses including future

medical expenses. In all, the claimant is entitled for

Rs.1,35,000/-. The Tribunal has already awarded

Rs.1,17,800/- and hence it requires modification.

6. Counsel appearing for the appellant also

produced additional document along with I.A. to show that

the policy was in force at the time of accident and

Insurance Company also verified the same and submits

that the same is valid and liability has to be modified and

the same has to be fastened on the Insurance Company.

7. In view of the discussions made above, I pass

the following:

ORDER

Appeal is allowed in part.

MFA No. 100460 of 2015

In modification of the impugned judgment and award

passed by the Tribunal, the claimant is entitled for a sum

of Rs.1,35,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date

of petition till realization as against Rs.1,17,800/- awarded

by the Tribunal and liability is fastened on the Insurance

Company.

The Insurance Company is directed to pay/deposit

the compensation amount along with interest within six

weeks from the date of this order.

Apportionment and deposit of the compensation

amount would be as per the award of the Tribunal.

The registry is directed to transmit the trial court

records forthwith.

Sd/-

JUDGE

SH

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter