Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 11581 Kant
Judgement Date : 5 September, 2022
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU
DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR. ALOK ARADHE
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
AND
THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S. VISHWAJITH SHETTY
C.C.C. NO.328 OF 2022
BETWEEN:
AZURE POWER INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
A COMPANY WITHIN THE MEANING OF
THE COMPANIES ACT 2013
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
SOUTHERN PARK, 5TH FLOOR, D-II
SAKET PLACE, SAKET, NEW DELHI
DELI 110 017
REP. BY ITS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY
MR. PRADEEP CHINIYA.
AZURE POWER (EARTH) PRIVATE LIMITED
A COMPANY WITHIN THE MEANING OF
THE COMPANIES ACT 2013
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT
SOUTHERN PARK, 5TH FLOOR, D-II
SAKET PLACE, SAKET, NEW DELHI
DELI 110 017
REP. BY ITS CONSTITUTED ATTORNEY
MR. PRADEEP CHINIYA.
... COMPLAINANT
(BY MS./MRS. PRIYA DHANKHAR A/W
MR. ARCHISHMAN CHAUDHARY, ADV.,)
2
AND:
1. SRI. BHARATI .D
MANAGING DIRECTOR
HUBLI ELECTRICITY SUPPLY CO. LTD.
P B ROAD, NAVANAGAR
HUBBALLI , KARNATAKA 580 025.
2. GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA
BY CHIEF SECRETARY
VIKASA SOUDHA
DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI
BENGLAURU - 560001.
... ACCUSED
(BY MS. STIPHANIA, ADV., FOR
MR. SHAHBAAZ HUSAIN, ADV., FOR A1
MRS. NAMITHA MAHESH B.G. AGA FOR A2)
---
THIS CCC IS FILED UNDER SECTION 11 AND 12 OF
THE CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT, 1971 AND RULE 3 OF THE
HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA (CONTEMPT OF COURT
PROCEEDINGS) RULES, 1981, PRAYING TO INITIATE
CONTEMPT PROCEEDINGS AGAINST THE ACCUSED AND
DECLARE THAT THE ACCUSED IS GUILTY OF THE
CONTEMPT BY WILLFULLY AND DELIBERATELY VIOLATING
THE JUDGMENT DATED 02.12.2021 IN WP NO.5368/2020
AND CONNECTED MATTERS (ANNEXURE-A). PUNISH THE
ACCUSED FOR COMMITTING CONTEMPT OF THIS HON BLE
COURT BY WILLFULLY AND DELIBERATELY VIOLATING THE
JUDGEMENT DATED 02.12.2021 IN WP NO.5368/2020 AND
CONNECTED MATTERS (ANNEXURE-A) & ETC.
THIS CCC COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY,
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
3
ORDER
Smt.Priya Dhankar, learned counsel for the
complainant.
Miss Stephania, learned counsel for the
respondent No.1.
Smt.Namitha Mahesh B.G., learned Additional
Government Advocate for the respondent No.2.
This petition has been filed for non-compliance
of the directions contained in the order dated
02.12.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in
W.P.No.5638/2020.
2. Learned counsel for the parties jointly submit
that the directions contained in the aforesaid order
have been complied with.
3. In view of the aforesaid submission, we are
not inclined to proceed further with the contempt
petition. However, liberty is reserved to the
complainant to take recourse to such remedy as may
be available to it in law in case grievance of the
complainant still subsists.
Accordingly, the contempt petition is disposed of.
Sd/-
ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE
Sd/-
JUDGE
RV
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!