Friday, 15, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

Akkawwa W/O. Alagouda Jagadev @ ... vs Danawwa W/O. Dundappa Jagadev @ ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 12520 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12520 Kant
Judgement Date : 17 October, 2022

Karnataka High Court
Akkawwa W/O. Alagouda Jagadev @ ... vs Danawwa W/O. Dundappa Jagadev @ ... on 17 October, 2022
Bench: R Natarajpresided Byrnj
                           -1-




                                     RFA No. 4166 of 2012

     IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH

        DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022

                         BEFORE
            THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE R.NATARAJ
       REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 4166 OF 2012 (PAR-)
BETWEEN:
1.    AKKAWWA W/O. ALAGOUDA JAGADEV @ MUDSHI
      AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
      R/O. HARUGERI, TQ: RAIBAG,
      DIST: BELGAUM

2.    SRIKANT ALAGOUDA JAGADEV @ MUDSHI
      AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
      R/O. HARUGERI, TQ: RAIBAG
      DIST: BELGAUM

3.    SADASHIV S/O. ALAGOUDA JAGADEV @ MUDSHI
      AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
      R/O. HARUGERI, TQ: RAIBAG
      DIST: BELGAUM

4.    BASAVRAJ ALAGOUDA JAGADEV @ MUDSHI
      AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
      R/O. HARUGERI, TQ: RAIBAG
      DIST: BELGAUM

5.    MALLAPPA ALAGOUDA JAGADEV @ MUDSHI
      AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
      R/O. HARUGERI, TQ: RAIBAG
      DIST: BELGAUM

6.    BALAWWA W/O. MAHAHLING KONNUR
      AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK
      R/O. BELAGALI, TQ: MUDHOL
      DIST: BAGALKOT
                              -2-




                                         RFA No. 4166 of 2012

7.    BORAWWA W/O. RAMAPPA INAPUR
      AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD
      WORKR/O.KHEMLAPUR, TQ: RAIBAG
      DIST: BELGAUM
                                                ...APPELLANTS
(BY SRI. M. H. PATIL .,ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.     DANAWWA W/O. DUNDAPPA JAGADEV @ MUDSHI
       AGE: MAJOR, OCC: AGRICULTURE
       R/O. HARUGERI, TQ: RAIBAG
       DIST: BELGAUM

2.     GURULING SATEPPA MUDSHI
       SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LRS

2A.    SUSHILA W/O. GURULING MUDSHI
       AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
       R/O. HARUGERI, TQ: RAIBAG,
       DIST: BELGAUM

2B.    BASAPPA GURULING MUDSHI
       SINCE DECEASED BY HIS LR'S

2B1 SAVITRI W/O.BASAPPA MUDSHI,
    AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD

2B2 OMSHREE D/O. BASAPPA MUDSHI,
    AGE: 10 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,

2B3 POOJYASHREE D/O. BASAPPA MUDSHI,
    AGE: 8 YEARS, OCC: STUDENT,

       2B1 TO 2B3 ARE R/O. HARUGERI,
       TQ: RAIBAG, DIST: BELGAUM

4.     MALLAPPA GURULING MUDSHI
       AGE: 64 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
       R/O. HARUGERI, TQ: RAIBAG,
                             -3-




                                       RFA No. 4166 of 2012

     DIST: BELGAUM

5.   SIDDAPPA GURULING MUDSHI
     AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
     R/O. HARUGERI, TQ: RAIBAG,
     DIST: BELGAUM

6.   HANAMANT SATEPPA MUDSHI
     AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
     R/O. HARUGERI, TQ: RAIBAG
     DIST: BELGAUM

7.   SHRISHAIL SATEPPA MUDSHI
     AGE: 49 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE
     R/O. HARUGERI, TQ: RAIBAG,
     DIST: BELGAUM

8.   SATAWWA W/O. SHIVAPPA KITTUR
     AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK
     R/O. YALLATTI, TQ: JAMKHANDI,
     DIST: BAGALKOT

9.   GEETA W/O. MAHADEV NADEPPAGOL
     AGE: 33 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK
     R/O. ARALIMATTI, TQ: GOKAK
     DIST: BELGAUM
                                            ...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. M. M. KHANNUR, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. PRUTHVI K. S., ADV., FOR R5;
R2A, R2(B1 TO B3), R2C, R2D, R3, R4 AND R6- NOTICE SERVED)

     THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 R/W ORDER XLI
RULE 1 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED
31.07.2012 PASSED IN O.S.NO.239/2008 ON THE FILE OF THE
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, RAIBAG, PARTLY DECREEING
THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION.
                                   -4-




                                                RFA No. 4166 of 2012

       THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, COURT
DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:


                               JUDGMENT

Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the

respondent No.1 expired on 31.03.2022. Since the time

allowed for bring the legal representatives of deceased

respondent No.1 has expired, the appeal as against

respondent No.1 is abated. Since the suit is filed for partition

and separate possession, the abatement of appeal as against

respondent No.1 would result in abatement of appeal as

against other respondents. Hence, the appeal is disposed off

as abated.

Sd/-

JUDGE

YAN

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : IJJ

 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter