Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 12319 Kant
Judgement Date : 11 October, 2022
-1-
MFA No. 20952 of 2013
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD
BENCH
DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2022
PRESENT
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S.SUNIL DUTT YADAV
AND
THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA
MFA NO. 20952 OF 2013 (MV-I)
BETWEEN:
SHIVALEELA W/O. BHIMAGOUDA PATIL
AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK,
R/O. NIDASOSHI, TQ: HUKKERI, DIST: BELAGAVI
...APPELLANT
(BY SRI. SANGRAM S KULKARNI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE PROJECT MANAGER
KARNATAKA STATE, HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT, K.R. CIRCLE, PWD BUILDING,
1ST FLOOR, BANGALORE
2. ROMAN TARMAT LTD.,
MOHANKUMAR
B SHELAR
TARMAT CHAMBERS, SECTOR NO. 24,
Digitally signed by
PLOT NO. 19, SAMPADA,
MOHANKUMAR B
SHELAR
Date: 2022.10.17
10:44:42 +0530
NEAR TURBHE FLYOVER,
-2-
MFA No. 20952 of 2013
NAVI MUMBAI-400 705
3. BHARAT S/O BHIMAGOUDA PATIL
AGE: 23 YEARS, OCC STUDENT,
R/O.NIDASOSHI, TQ HUKKERI,
DIST BELAGAVI.
4. VINAYAK S/O BHIMAGOUDA PATIL
AGE: 23 YEARS, OCC:STUDENT,
R/O.NIDASOSHI, TQ HUKKERI,
DIST BELAGAVI.
...RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. PRAVEEN K. UPPAR, HCGP FOR R1)
(R2 TO R4 ARE SERVED)
THIS MFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF MV ACT,
PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED
26.09.2012 PASSED BY THE I ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND
MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BELAGAVI IN MVC
NO.1293/2010 AND ALLOWING THIS APPEAL DIRECT THE
RESPONDNET NO.1 AND RESPONDENT NO.2 TO PAY
REASONABLE COMPENSATION TO THE PETITIONER, IN THE
INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY THE
S. SUNIL DUTT YADAV J., MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
-3-
MFA No. 20952 of 2013
ORDER
Learned counsel for the appellant files a memo
seeking to withdraw the appeal while reserving liberty to
approach Civil Court and redress her grievances in
accordance with law.
2. Further, request is also made for exclusion of time
spent before the Tribunal as well as before this Court so as
to prevent her case being thrown out on the ground of
limitation.
3. After hearing the matter for some time and taking note
of the peculiar facts of this case, the appellant is permitted
to withdraw the appeal reserving liberty to approach
appropriate forum and redress her grievances. Time spent
during disposal of this appeal as well as before the
Tribunal is to be excluded as time spent bonafidely before
a wrong forum, taking note that proceedings before the
MFA No. 20952 of 2013
Tribunal are summary in nature and would not be a proper
forum insofar as grievances of the appellant is concerned.
Accordingly, appeal is disposed off.
Sd/-
JUDGE
Sd/-
JUDGE
HMB
Publish Your Article
Campus Ambassador
Media Partner
Campus Buzz
LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026
LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!