Monday, 04, May, 2026
 
 
 
Expand O P Jindal Global University
 
  
  
 
 
 

The Income Tax Officer vs The Yamakanmardi Laxmi Urban ...
2022 Latest Caselaw 7534 Kant

Citation : 2022 Latest Caselaw 7534 Kant
Judgement Date : 26 May, 2022

Karnataka High Court
The Income Tax Officer vs The Yamakanmardi Laxmi Urban ... on 26 May, 2022
Bench: Krishna S Dixit, P.Krishna Bhat
                                              -1-
                                                                WA No.100104/2020




                           IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,
                                    DHARWAD BENCH

                       DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF MAY, 2022

                                           PRESENT

                      THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE KRISHNA S.DIXIT

                                              AND

                      THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE P.KRISHNA BHAT

                       WRIT APPEAL NO.100104 OF 2020 (T-IT)

                      BETWEEN:

                      1.   THE INCOME TAX OFFICER,
                           WARD-1, GOKAK,
                           DR.GHODIGERIS HOSPITAL BUILDING,
                           BELAGAVI ROAD, GOKAK-591307.

                      2.   COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ACT, GOKAK,
                           DR.GHODIGERIS HOSPITAL BUILDING,
                           BELAGAVI ROAD, GOKAK-591307.

                      3.   THE CENTRAL BOARD OF DIRECT TAXES,
                           NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001,
                           REP. BY ITS CHAIRPERSON.

                      4.   MINISTRY OF FINANCE,
                           REVENUE DEPARTMENT,
                           NORTH BLOCK, NEW DELHI-110001,
                           REP. BY ITS UNDER SECRETARY.

                                                              ... APPELLANTS
        Digitally     (BY SHRI Y.V. RAVIRAJ
        signed by J
        MAMATHA       & SHRI TULAJAPPA KALBURGI, ADVOCATES)
J       Location:
MAMATHA DHARWAD
        Date:
        2022.05.28
        11:52:56
        +0530
                           -2-
                                           WA No.100104/2020




AND:

1.   SHRI BRHAMADEV URBAN CREDIT SOUHARDA
     SAHAKARI INIYAMIT, YAMAKANMARDI,
     MARKET ROAD, YAMAKANMARDI,
     TQ: HUKKERI, DIST: BELAGAVI,
     REP. BY ITS CEO,
     SRI ANAND S/O BASAVANNI CHANNAPGOL,
     AGED: 46 YEARS.

2.   GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA,
     CO-OPERATION DEPARTMENT,
     KARNATAKA GOVERNMENT SECRETARIAT,
     ROOM NO.610, 3RD GATE, 6TH FLOOR,
     M.S. BUILDING, DR.AMBEDKAR VEEDHI,
     BENGALURU-560001,
     REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY.

3.   REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES,
     NO.1, ALI ASKER ROAD,
     NEAR RAJ BHAVAN, VASANTH NAGAR,
     BENGALURU-560052,
     REPRESENTED BY ITS REGISTRAR.

                                     ... RESPONDENTS
(BY SHRI H.R. KAMBIYAVAR
 & SMT. PATRI SHASHIKAL, ADVOCATES FOR R1;
 SHRI G.K. HIREGOUDAR, GOVT. ADOVATE FOR R2 & R3)

       THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S.4 OF KARNATAKA
HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING THIS HON BLE COURT TO
SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE
JUDGE IN WP.NO.110346/2019 (T-IT) DATED 27.01.2020;
TO PASS SUCH OTHER SUITABLE ORDERS AS THIS HON BLE
COURT DEEMS FIT ON THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF
THE CASE.


       THIS   APPEAL   COMING   ON   FOR    PRELIMINARY
HEARING, THIS DAY, KRISHNA S.DIXIT, J., DELIVERED
THE FOLLOWING:
                           -3-
                                             WA No.100104/2020




                      JUDGMENT

The subject matter of this appeal we are told

is substantially similar to the one in W.A.

No.378/2020 (T-IT) connected with W.A. No.

406/2020 (T-IT) between the Government of

India & another Vs. Karnataka State Souharda

Federal Co-operative Limited and another,

disposed off by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court

vide order dated 20th December 2021.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant does

not, in all fairness, dispute the above position as

contended by learned counsel appearing for the

respondent-assessee. Learned AGA too echoes the

same. No case for deviating from the view taken by

the said Co-ordinate Bench is made out before us,

either.

In the above circumstances, we find no merits

to interfere in this appeal and accordingly, the same

stands rejected. Pending applications, if any, pale

WA No.100104/2020

into insignificance in view of the rejection of the

appeal.

Costs made easy.

Sd/-

JUDGE

Sd/-

JUDGE

Vnp*

 
Download the LatestLaws.com Mobile App
 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter
 

Publish Your Article

 

Campus Ambassador

 

Media Partner

 

Campus Buzz

 

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent

LatestLaws Guest Court Correspondent Apply Now!
 

LatestLaws.com presents: Lexidem Offline Internship Program, 2026

 

LatestLaws.com presents 'Lexidem Online Internship, 2026', Apply Now!

 
 

LatestLaws Partner Event : Smt. Nirmala Devi Bam Memorial International Moot Court Competition

 
 
Latestlaws Newsletter